Texas Senate Bill SB2143

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to the authority of the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas to commission peace officers.

Impact

The passage of SB 2143 has significant implications for both tribal governance and state law enforcement. By empowering the Kickapoo Tribe to commission their own peace officers, the bill supports self-determination and local governance for the tribe. This measure also reflects the ongoing partnership between state authority and tribal sovereignty, ensuring that law enforcement is responsive to the unique needs and circumstances of the Kickapoo community while adhering to state law. The effective enforcement of laws within tribal lands can contribute to improved safety and security for tribe members.

Summary

Senate Bill 2143 addresses the authority of the Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas to commission peace officers. The bill modifies Article 2.126 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, allowing the tribal council of the Kickapoo Tribe to employ and commission peace officers. This enactment situates the peace officers within the tribe's reservation, giving them the authority to enforce state laws pertinent to that jurisdiction. The legislation aims to enhance law enforcement capabilities on tribal lands while aligning them with state law requirements.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 2143 was generally positive, with strong support from stakeholders who see the bill as a step forward for tribal sovereignty and self-regulation. The bill received overwhelming approval in both the Senate and House, indicating a legislative consensus on its importance. Advocates of the bill, including tribal leaders and local representatives, emphasized the necessity of empowering tribal law enforcement as a means of enhancing public safety. However, there may be concerns from those wary of the implications of increased tribal authority, although these voices were less pronounced in the legislative discourse.

Contention

While SB 2143 passed with significant bipartisan support, it brings to light issues of jurisdiction and the balance of power between state and tribal authorities. Critics could potentially argue that creating a distinct law enforcement entity within the tribal system might complicate relationships with state law enforcement agencies. However, the primary contention appears focused on ensuring that the rights and autonomy of the Kickapoo Tribe are upheld rather than any significant opposition to the concept of tribal peace officers themselves.