Texas Senate Bill SB2332

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to reporting to the legislature by certain river authorities.

Impact

The passage of SB 2332 is likely to have a significant impact on the legislative oversight of river authorities in Texas. By formalizing the requirement for periodic reporting, the bill aims to improve the responsiveness of these agencies to legislative oversight and the public. It specifically seeks to facilitate a systematic review process which could lead to better management practices and increased accountability within regional water management entities. The bill reflects an effort to align legislative expectations with the realities of water governance in the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 2332, introduced by Senator Creighton, focuses on enhancing the accountability of certain river authorities in Texas. The bill mandates that specific river authorities deliver a report to the relevant legislative committee every six years, following a review by the Sunset Advisory Commission. This report must detail any changes made to the rules of the river authority since the last review and describe the implications of those changes. The intent behind this legislation is to ensure transparency and ongoing oversight of river authorities' operations and governance.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB 2332 appears to be positive among proponents of enhanced transparency and accountability in government entities. Supporters argue that this legislation is a necessary step to ensure river authorities can be held accountable for their decisions and operations. However, discussions around the bill indicate that there may be concerns about the administrative burden it might place on the river authorities themselves, though such concerns have not prominently featured in the discourse.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB 2332 could emerge from how river authorities perceive their autonomy in governance versus the imposed legislative oversight. While the intention is to create a framework for accountability, river authorities may feel that the additional reporting requirement could limit their operational flexibility. The dynamics of this debate are likely to reflect broader tensions between state oversight and local governance, especially in matters related to water management and resources.