Texas Senate Bill SB554

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Relating to establishing actual progress for the purposes of determining the right to repurchase real property from a condemning entity.

Impact

The impact of SB554 on state laws is significant as it sets clearer standards regarding the assessment of progress by condemning entities. By outlining specific actions that can be recognized as progress, property owners can more effectively assert their rights to repurchase their land. The legislation can lead to a greater accountability for governmental entities in managing condemned properties and ensure that they are making genuine efforts to develop projects that align with public use needs. This clarity can also facilitate smoother interactions between property owners and governmental authorities, potentially reducing legal disputes over property rights.

Summary

Senate Bill 554 is a legislative proposal aimed at modifying the criteria for determining 'actual progress' related to the repurchase of real property from a condemning entity. The bill amends Section 21.101 of the Texas Property Code to clarify what constitutes actual progress, allowing for a more efficient process for property owners who seek to reclaim their land after it has been condemned. The new definition includes a series of activities such as significant labor, the provision of materials, and contractual relationships, enabling a more precise evaluation of progress toward public use projects.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB554 appears to be primarily supportive, especially among those who advocate for property rights and clear guidelines in the condemnation process. Many stakeholders, including property owners and developers, favor the bill for its potential to provide legal protections and ensure fair treatment during property acquisition processes. However, some concerns have been raised about the implications for public projects, questioning whether these new criteria might slow down the initiation of necessary developments and services that benefit the community.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include the balance between protecting property rights and ensuring timely development of public projects. Critics of the bill may argue that by imposing stringent criteria for what counts as actual progress, it could lead to delays in important infrastructure projects. Additionally, discussions may have surfaced regarding how these changes might affect the operations of various governmental entities, particularly port authorities and navigation districts that rely on efficient land acquisition processes to carry out public use projects.