LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 12, 2021 TO: Honorable Andrew S. Murr, Chair, House Committee on Corrections FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB358 by Sherman, Sr. (Relating to certain technical violations of conditions of community supervision.), As Introduced Decreasing the number of individuals whose community supervision can be revoked could result in fewer demands upon the correctional resources of the counties and of the State. The probable fiscal impact of implementing the bill is indeterminate due to the lack of statewide data related to the specific circumstances involved in the technical violation of community supervision specified in the bill under which supervision is revoked. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as it relates to procedures for certain technical violations of community supervision. Under the provisions of the bill, only certain individuals would be eligible for revocation based on a technical violation of community supervision. Those ineligible for revocation would be subject to supervision modifications, including confinement. Decreasing the number of individuals whose community supervision can be revoked could result in fewer demands upon the correctional resources of the counties and of the State due to fewer individuals confined in state or county correctional institutions. Whether the bill would result in a significant fiscal impact is indeterminate due to the lack of statewide data related to the technical violations associated with conditions of community supervision as specified by the bill's provisions. The Office of Court Administration indicates the modifications outlined in the bill's provisions will not result in a significant fiscal impact on the state court system. Local Government ImpactAccording to the Office of Court Administration, local government may see some savings from fewer defendants having their community supervision revoked and incarcerated in local jails; however, no significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 696 Department of Criminal Justice LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, LM, DGI
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 12, 2021
TO: Honorable Andrew S. Murr, Chair, House Committee on Corrections FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB358 by Sherman, Sr. (Relating to certain technical violations of conditions of community supervision.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Andrew S. Murr, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB358 by Sherman, Sr. (Relating to certain technical violations of conditions of community supervision.), As Introduced
Honorable Andrew S. Murr, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
Honorable Andrew S. Murr, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB358 by Sherman, Sr. (Relating to certain technical violations of conditions of community supervision.), As Introduced
HB358 by Sherman, Sr. (Relating to certain technical violations of conditions of community supervision.), As Introduced
Decreasing the number of individuals whose community supervision can be revoked could result in fewer demands upon the correctional resources of the counties and of the State. The probable fiscal impact of implementing the bill is indeterminate due to the lack of statewide data related to the specific circumstances involved in the technical violation of community supervision specified in the bill under which supervision is revoked.
Decreasing the number of individuals whose community supervision can be revoked could result in fewer demands upon the correctional resources of the counties and of the State. The probable fiscal impact of implementing the bill is indeterminate due to the lack of statewide data related to the specific circumstances involved in the technical violation of community supervision specified in the bill under which supervision is revoked.
Decreasing the number of individuals whose community supervision can be revoked could result in fewer demands upon the correctional resources of the counties and of the State. The probable fiscal impact of implementing the bill is indeterminate due to the lack of statewide data related to the specific circumstances involved in the technical violation of community supervision specified in the bill under which supervision is revoked.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as it relates to procedures for certain technical violations of community supervision. Under the provisions of the bill, only certain individuals would be eligible for revocation based on a technical violation of community supervision. Those ineligible for revocation would be subject to supervision modifications, including confinement. Decreasing the number of individuals whose community supervision can be revoked could result in fewer demands upon the correctional resources of the counties and of the State due to fewer individuals confined in state or county correctional institutions. Whether the bill would result in a significant fiscal impact is indeterminate due to the lack of statewide data related to the technical violations associated with conditions of community supervision as specified by the bill's provisions. The Office of Court Administration indicates the modifications outlined in the bill's provisions will not result in a significant fiscal impact on the state court system.
Decreasing the number of individuals whose community supervision can be revoked could result in fewer demands upon the correctional resources of the counties and of the State due to fewer individuals confined in state or county correctional institutions. Whether the bill would result in a significant fiscal impact is indeterminate due to the lack of statewide data related to the technical violations associated with conditions of community supervision as specified by the bill's provisions. The Office of Court Administration indicates the modifications outlined in the bill's provisions will not result in a significant fiscal impact on the state court system.
Local Government Impact
According to the Office of Court Administration, local government may see some savings from fewer defendants having their community supervision revoked and incarcerated in local jails; however, no significant fiscal impact to local courts is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 696 Department of Criminal Justice
212 Office of Court Admin, 696 Department of Criminal Justice
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, LM, DGI
JMc, DKN, LM, DGI