Texas House Bill HB783

Texas 2021 - 87th Regular

Caption

Relating to the powers and duties of the Parks and Wildlife Department regarding wind-powered energy devices; providing a civil penalty.

Impact

The implementation of HB 783 introduces regulation in areas where previously there may have been none regarding the installation of wind-powered energy devices near sensitive ecological and recreational areas. By evaluating the visual and acoustic impacts on these lands, as well as considering public health and safety, the bill's enforcement measures include civil penalties for violations. The bill allows for the adoption of rules that could restrict the placement of wind energy facilities to safeguard these protected landscapes from potential adverse effects.

Summary

House Bill 783 addresses the powers and duties of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department concerning wind-powered energy devices. The bill establishes a framework to manage the impact of wind energy installations on protected lands, such as state or federal parks and natural areas. The legislation aims to ensure that the environmental and cultural values of these protected sites are preserved while allowing for the development of wind energy resources. It sets forth definitions, purposes, and areas where regulations apply, specifically relating to the Devils River State Natural Area and adjacent counties.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 783 appears generally supportive among stakeholders focused on environmental protection and sustainable development. Advocates of wind energy may view this bill as a necessary measure to balance energy production with conservation efforts. However, there may also be concerns about the implications for energy developers who might find additional restrictions cumbersome. The dialogue around the bill involves discussions on the need for renewable energy advancements while ensuring protection for Texas's natural resources.

Contention

Notable contention points may arise from the enforcement mechanisms included in the bill, as stakeholders weigh the implications of civil penalties against energy development efforts. The balancing act between expanding renewable energy infrastructure and preserving state parks and natural areas could present conflicts between developers and environmental advocates. Some may argue that the bill may hinder renewable energy projects essential for long-term sustainability objectives while others consider the potential ecological impacts of unregulated development in sensitive areas.