Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing legislative action at any time during a regular session of the legislature on a bill that extends the existence of an agency, commission, or advisory committee following legislative review.
If passed, this amendment would allow for greater flexibility in legislative decision-making concerning state agencies and committees that require extension after their reviews. Currently, the legislative timeline might restrict the responsiveness of the legislature to extend these entities. The proposed rule aims to streamline the process and ensure that essential state functions can continue without unnecessary delays, which advocates argue is crucial for governance and public service.
HJR111 is a joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Texas Constitution that permits the legislature to take action at any time during a regular session on bills aimed at extending the existence of an agency, commission, or advisory committee, following a legislative review. The amendment specifically alters Section 5 of Article III of the Texas Constitution, making provisions for more timely legislative responses regarding the continuity of state agencies and entities post-review.
The sentiment surrounding HJR111 appears supportive among those who advocate for efficient government operation and timely legislative processes. Proponents suggest that this flexibility would enhance operational efficiency and the continued efficacy of state agencies. However, there may also be contingent concerns regarding the implications of allowing such amendments to the constitutional process, as critics might worry about potential overreach or hasty legislative decisions made without adequate review.
A notable point of contention surrounding HJR111 is related to the balance of power within the legislative process. While supporters claim that allowing the legislature to act at any time increases responsiveness, opponents may argue that it could undermine checks and balances that provide a level of scrutiny necessary for foundational governance. This point reflects broader tensions in legislative oversight and the appropriate limits of legislative power.