Expressing commitment to eliminating racially offensive place names and urging the U.S. Board on Geographic Names to approve requests to change racially offensive names of geographic features.
If enacted, SCR29 would facilitate the process of renaming racially offensive geographic features, reflecting the state's commitment to racial equity and cultural sensitivity. The resolution emphasizes the importance of aligning geographic names with the values of inclusion and diversity that represent the contemporary Texas population. It would not only help rectify historical injustices but also contribute to a broader cultural shift towards recognizing and honoring all communities in Texas. This action underscores the state's acknowledgment of past neglect in addressing racially insensitive names, and it aims to promote social change through legislative action.
SCR29 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution expressing the Texas Legislature's commitment to eliminating racially offensive place names throughout the state. It draws attention to a report indicating that there are at least 28 geographic features with names that are considered racially offensive. Notably, the resolution references a previous legislative action taken in 1991 (H.B. 1756) that aimed to address the issue, yet highlights the ongoing challenge as several of the names remain unchanged 30 years later. The resolution concludes by urging the U.S. Board on Geographic Names to approve name change requests submitted by Texas, aligning with the ongoing efforts to promote a more inclusive representation of the state's geographic features.
The sentiment surrounding SCR29 has been overwhelmingly positive, with a unanimous adoption in both the Senate (31-0) and the House (146-0). Lawmakers across party lines expressed support for the resolution, viewing it as a critical step in addressing issues of racial sensitivity and inclusivity in Texas. The lack of dissent highlights a collective recognition of the importance of changing these place names, although discussions may still arise regarding the specific process of renaming and the involvement of local communities in proposing new names. Overall, the resolution reflects a growing awareness and proactive approach to issues of race and representation in public spaces.
While SCR29 aims to initiate the renaming process for offensive place names, it does not specifically legislate the changes but rather urges the U.S. Board on Geographic Names to take action. Some potential contention could arise concerning the selection of new names or the involvement of the communities affected by the changes. Historical revisionism may also spark debates about how name changes could alter local heritage and identity, as certain names may have historical significance despite their offensive nature. This resolution opens the floor for conversations about how best to approach sensitive cultural topics in public discourse.