Texas House Bill HB270

Texas 2021 - 87th 1st C.S.

Caption

Relating to the entitlement of a member of the legislature to receive certain state funds following an absence without leave when the applicable house of the legislature lacks a quorum to do business.

Impact

The implementation of HB270 would primarily affect the stipulations outlined in Chapter 301 of the Government Code, which governs the entitlements and responsibilities of legislative members. By prohibiting the disbursement of these state funds during certain absences, the bill is expected to impact how legislators approach their attendance in the House. Proponents argue that the bill could lead to increased attendance and engagement, thereby ensuring a more functional legislative process. Opponents may view this as an unfair penalty that might discourage public service due to strict financial implications for absence.

Summary

House Bill 270 aims to amend the Government Code of Texas by establishing a provision which disallows members of the legislature from receiving certain state funds during a specified period if they are absent without leave when their respective house lacks a quorum to conduct business. The bill specifically focuses on ensuring that legislator attendance and participation are regulated by tying entitlement to state funds to their presence in sessions. This is viewed as a measure to increase accountability among lawmakers, ensuring that those who do not participate do not benefit financially from the legislature's operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB270 may arise from discussions regarding the definition of 'absence without leave' and how it is adjudicated. This brings up important questions about the flexibility of legislative responsibilities and the unforeseen circumstances that could necessitate absence. Detractors might argue that the bill could disproportionately affect members with legitimate reasons for absence, thereby influencing their ability to secure funds for their office's operational needs. Additionally, the effectiveness of tying funding to attendance might come into question, sparking debates on potential unintended consequences within legislative operations.