Texas House Bill HB2568

Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

• Filed: 2/21/23
• Out of House Committee: 4/4/23
• Voted on by House: 5/2/23
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/12/23
• Voted on by Senate: 5/16/23
• Governor Action: 6/11/23

Caption

Relating to a study of carrizo cane on the international border of this state.

Impact

The bill aims to gather essential data to aid in the management of Carrizo cane, which has been problematic since previous legislative attempts to address its proliferation faced challenges due to inadequate funding and ineffective implementation. The results of the study will not only provide insight into the necessary eradication efforts but will also be essential for developing future regulations and potential legislative actions to mitigate the invasive species' environmental impact significantly.

Summary

House Bill 2568, introduced by Representative Hayes, addresses the invasive growth of Carrizo cane (Arundo donax) along the Rio Grande. This bill tasks the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board with conducting a comprehensive study on the extent of Carrizo cane's expansion. Given its height and density, Carrizo cane poses significant obstacles for law enforcement operations and contributes to alarming water depletion, threatening the water supply for surrounding communities dependent on the Rio Grande for drinking and irrigation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 2568 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who recognize the potential environmental and security implications of Carrizo cane's unchecked growth. Lawmakers and stakeholders seem to agree that systematic study is crucial for addressing the invasive species while balancing the need for border security and natural resource conservation. The bill gained significant legislative support, passing the House with 129 yeas and only 13 nays, followed by unanimous Senate approval.

Contention

While there is strong backing for the bill, discussions have highlighted concerns regarding the urgency and potential costs associated with the proposed study and subsequent eradication programs. Critics may argue about the effectiveness of previous efforts and the feasibility of managing the invasive plant thoroughly. Additionally, there may be underlying debates regarding the prioritization of resources for this study versus other pressing environmental issues facing the state.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Agriculture Code

• Chapter 2. State Agricultural Policy
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section

• Chapter 201. Soil And Water Conservation
  • Section: 0225
  • Section: 0225