Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2758

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to a prohibition on state contracts with certain foreign companies or organizations; authorizing a civil penalty.

Impact

The implementation of HB2758 will significantly alter the landscape of state contracting laws. By introducing these prohibitions, the bill aims to create a safe environment by mitigating any potential risks that could arise from dealings with vendors associated with countries deemed as adversaries. It establishes a framework for state agencies to determine vendor eligibility based on their geographic and ownership ties, which could reduce the number of eligible vendors for state contracts and possibly impact various sectors reliant on state purchases and services.

Summary

House Bill 2758 seeks to prohibit state contracts with certain foreign companies or organizations, specifically those based in so-called 'scrutinized countries' such as China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia. The bill requires that state agencies verify that they are not contracting with vendors that are controlled by these foreign governments or located in these countries. This legislative move is primarily directed at enhancing the state’s contract transparency and security, ensuring that state resources are not utilized in ways that may compromise national interests or safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2758 appears to be largely supportive among those prioritizing national security and economic independence. Proponents argue that it is a necessary measure to secure Texas from foreign influence and protect taxpayer-funded contracts from being awarded to entities possibly benefiting foreign governments. However, there are concerns that such restrictions may limit competition and drive up costs for the state due to a reduced pool of available contractors, indicating a significant divide in opinions on the best approach to international business relations.

Contention

Debate around HB2758 reflects a broader concern about the implications of foreign interactions in state affairs. Critics are concerned that this bill may unfairly discriminate against certain companies regardless of their business integrity, simply based on their country of origin. Additionally, the enforcement of civil penalties for false verification could create operational challenges for state agencies, raising questions about how to effectively and fairly implement these provisions without inadvertently stifling lawful international commerce that involves legitimate vendors.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX SB2405

Relating to state contracts with Chinese companies and investments in Chinese companies and certain companies doing business with China; authorizing a civil penalty.

TX SB1585

Relating to a prohibition on governmental contracts with companies of foreign adversaries for certain information and communications technology; authorizing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB129

Relating to a prohibition on certain governmental contracts with foreign adversary companies and federally banned companies; authorizing a civil penalty.

TX HB2244

Relating to a prohibition on state contracts to purchase electric vehicles and related components produced in scrutinized countries; authorizing a civil penalty.

TX HB2403

Relating to a prohibition on governmental contracts with Chinese companies for certain information and communications technology; authorizing a civil penalty.

TX HB1907

Relating to a prohibition on governmental contracts with Chinese companies for certain information and communications technology; authorizing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

TX HB2409

Relating to a prohibition on governmental contracts with Chinese companies for certain information and communications technology; authorizing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

TX SB2116

Relating to prohibiting contracts or other agreements with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure in this state.

TX HB4359

Relating to prohibiting contracts or other agreements with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure in this state.

TX HB3067

State government; prohibiting state contracts with certain companies; requiring certification for certain companies; providing penalties; effective date.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.