Relating to the expulsion of public school students for engaging in conduct that constitutes serious offenses.
Impact
The potential impact of HB 285 is significant, as it revises key sections of the Education Code that govern student expulsion. The bill reinforces strict policies against violence and weapon possession in schools, aiming to enhance student safety. By clarifying what constitutes a serious offense, the legislation may lead to a more standardized approach in handling disciplinary actions across school districts. However, the bill also raises concerns about the effects on students and families, particularly regarding the educational and social consequences of expulsion for serious offenses.
Summary
House Bill 285 aims to amend the Education Code regarding the expulsion of public school students for serious offenses. This legislation prescribes specific conduct that mandates expulsion, including acts of unlawful weapon carrying, aggravated assault, and other serious violent offenses. Additionally, the bill revises provisions concerning the disciplinary actions schools may take in response to student misconduct, emphasizing the nature of the offenses that warrant expulsion. It seeks to create a clearer framework for expulsion procedures within Texas public schools, promoting safer learning environments.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 285 is mixed among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step towards maintaining discipline and safety in schools, reflecting an unyielding stance against serious misconduct. They believe the measure promotes accountability among students and protects the school community. Conversely, detractors express concern that it may lead to excessive expulsions for offenses that could otherwise be addressed through supportive measures or interventions, which could disproportionately affect vulnerable students and exacerbate educational disparities.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the implications of stricter expulsion policies on student outcomes and the concept of zero-tolerance approaches to school discipline. Critics argue that such policies may not take into account the context of student behavior or the effectiveness of alternative disciplinary measures. The concerns encompass the ability of students to re-integrate into educational settings post-expulsion and the essential need for schools to provide a supportive environment rather than a punitive one. The debate underscores the balancing act between ensuring safety and fostering an inclusive educational atmosphere.
Relating to requiring the expulsion of a public school student who engages in certain conduct that constitutes the felony offense of terroristic threat.
Relating to creating the criminal offenses of providing material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, engaging in terroristic activities, and threatened terroristic violence.
Relating to the removal of a student from public school for the possession, use, or delivery of e-cigarettes on or near public school property or at certain school events.
Relating to certain requirements imposed on a sex offender who enters the premises of a school and to the refusal of entry to or ejection from school district property.
Relating to public school discipline policies, practices, and procedures regarding student substance use and substance abuse prevention and intervention and mental health training for campus behavior coordinators.