Relating to orders for the conservatorship of, possession of or access to, or support of a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.
The proposed amendments underscore the importance of the child's best interest while considering various factors, including the child's wishes, their emotional and physical needs, and the stability of proposed placements. The bill establishes a framework for a new subchapter dedicated to equal parenting orders, which would regulate how parents share physical custody and make child support arrangements. These changes are planned to impact ongoing and future cases involving child custody matters, making it critical for family law practitioners and parents to be aware of the implications.
House Bill 3379 aims to amend existing statutes within the Texas Family Code related to conservatorship, possession, and access to children in the context of parent-child relationships. It introduces a presumption of equal or nearly equal periods of possession of a child for parents who are designated as joint managing conservators and reside within 20 miles of each other. This significant legislative change is geared towards promoting shared parenting arrangements and ensuring that children maintain regular contact with both parents post-separation or divorce.
The sentiment around HB3379 appears to be generally positive among proponents of shared parenting, who advocate for maintaining strong relationships between children and both parents following family separations. However, it may also bring up concerns among critics regarding the feasibility and practical implementation of equal parenting orders, particularly in complex cases where one parent may pose a risk to the child's welfare. The proposal is expected to foster robust discussions around ensuring child safety while promoting shared parenting practices.
While the bill seeks to enforce equal parenting principles, contention may arise regarding the situation of parents living further apart or within situations involving domestic issues. Critics may argue that blanket equal parenting orders do not account for individual circumstances, including instances of family violence or other compelling factors that could influence what constitutes the 'best interest' of the child. The debates surrounding these issues illustrate the challenge of balancing parental rights with the need to prioritize children's safety and emotional well-being.