Relating to the recovery of certain direct administrative costs incurred by the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy in imposing disciplinary action against a license holder.
Impact
If enacted, HB3521 would significantly impact the financial practices of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy by allowing them to impose additional costs on license holders found to have engaged in misconduct. The enforcement of such financial penalties could assist in covering the expenses associated with investigations and disciplinary actions, thus relieving some financial burdens on the state budget. Furthermore, it could enhance compliance among license holders, as the potential for personal financial repercussions might motivate adherence to regulatory standards.
Summary
House Bill 3521 addresses the recovery of certain direct administrative costs incurred by the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy when imposing disciplinary actions against license holders. The bill aims to amend Section 901.501 of the Occupations Code to allow the Board to charge license holders for costs associated with disciplinary proceedings, including investigative expenses, attorney fees, and related administrative costs. This legislative move is meant to ensure that the Board can recover expenses that arise from enforcing disciplinary measures, thereby potentially providing better financial resources for regulatory enforcement.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally supportive among fiscal conservatives who advocate for accountability and the efficient use of state resources. Conversely, there may be concerns from some quarters regarding the fairness and equity of imposing additional financial burdens on license holders, particularly for smaller or independent practitioners who may struggle with these costs. Thus, the reception of the bill could vary depending on the stakeholders' perspectives on regulation and fiscal responsibility.
Contention
The notable points of contention likely arise from the implications of imposing additional costs on license holders. Critics may argue that this added financial pressure could disproportionately affect small firms or individual practitioners, potentially driving them out of business or discouraging new entrants to the field. Proponents, however, assert that the ability to recover costs is essential for the sustainability of the Board’s enforcement operations, emphasizing that accountability is necessary for maintaining the integrity of the profession.
Relating to the regulation of physicians, the disciplinary authority of the Texas Medical Board, and the administration of the Texas Physician Health Program; increasing a criminal penalty; imposing a surcharge.
Relating to the practices and professions regulated by the Texas Appraiser Licensing and Certification Board; requiring an occupational license; imposing fees.
Relating to the authorization, licensing, and regulation of casino gaming in this state and the creation, powers, and duties of the Texas Gaming Commission; imposing and authorizing administrative and civil penalties; imposing a tax; imposing and authorizing fees; requiring occupational licenses; creating criminal offenses; making an appropriation.
Relating to the continuation of the self-directed and semi-independent status of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, the Texas Board of Professional Engineers, and the Texas Board of Architectural Examiners.
Relating to the continuation of the self-directed and semi-independent status of the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, the Texas Board of Professional Engineers, and the Texas Board of Architectural Examiners.