Texas House Bill HB4273

Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

• Filed: 3/9/23

Caption

Relating to transportation procedures for certain end stage renal disease facility patients during a declared disaster.

Impact

The amendment of Section 773.050 of the Health and Safety Code signifies a shift towards improved emergency response specifically tailored to vulnerable populations, like ESRD patients. This bill introduces a proactive approach to disaster planning within the healthcare sector, emphasizing the need for emergency services to specifically consider the transportation of patients requiring dialysis. The requirement for EMS providers to share their procedures with the department is intended to create accountability and ensure that adequate plans are in place for quick implementation during emergencies.

Summary

House Bill 4273 addresses the transportation needs of patients receiving treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) during declared disasters. The bill mandates that emergency medical services (EMS) providers develop and implement procedures for transporting these patients to their dialysis facilities when their usual means of transport is rendered unavailable due to a disaster situation. This change is critical, as it aims to ensure that patients do not miss their essential treatments during emergencies, thereby potentially reducing health risks associated with interrupted care.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 4273 appears supportive within healthcare circles, particularly among advocates for patients with chronic conditions. It highlights a legislative initiative aimed at safeguarding patient health during emergencies—a concern that resonates deeply with healthcare providers and patient advocates. However, the sentiment may be mixed among those who fear increased regulations on EMS providers without corresponding support or funding enhancements.

Contention

While the bill has clear intentions to aid ESRD patients, potential concerns could arise around the practicality of implementing new transportation protocols by EMS providers, especially in areas already facing resource constraints. Questions may also be raised regarding the specifics of what constitutes an adequate alternative transportation plan, as well as the speed and efficiency with which these plans can be actualized in a disaster scenario. The need for EMS to adjust procedures could lead to a debate over operational costs and whether additional funding will be necessary for these changes.