Texas House Bill HB4704

Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

• Filed: 3/10/23
• Out of House Committee: 4/17/23
• Voted on by House: 5/1/23
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/18/23
• Voted on by Senate: 5/21/23
• Governor Action: 6/13/23

Caption

Relating to taxing authority of Jackson County County-Wide Drainage District.

Impact

If enacted, HB4704 is poised to significantly affect local flood management efforts by allowing the Jackson County County-Wide Drainage District to communicate more effectively with voters about its tax needs. The legislative committee discussions expressed that the current ballot language did not provide clarity, which could lead to voter confusion. By amending the ballot language requirements, local governance will be more aligned with practical realities, enabling the district to manage its finances effectively while continuing to address the pressing issue of flood prevention in the county.

Summary

House Bill 4704 aims to enhance the taxing authority of the Jackson County County-Wide Drainage District in Texas, specifically addressing the flexibility in their tax approval process for funding flood management and prevention projects. The bill allows the district to include language on tax election ballots that more accurately reflects the intended tax rate while maintaining a maximum tax rate cap of 75 cents per $100 of assessed property value. This measure is expected to streamline the process through which the district can secure necessary funding for its operations and maintenance projects.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill appeared to be supportive among local stakeholders, particularly those working within the Jackson County drainage district. Representatives from the district expressed the need for more accurate ballot language to facilitate voter understanding and to ensure that local funding can be adequately secured. The discussions indicated a collaborative effort to address local flooding issues, reflecting a broad consensus on the importance of these funds for community safety and infrastructure.

Contention

While the sentiment was largely positive, opposition may arise concerning fiscal responsibilities and the implications of tax increases. Some representatives expressed concerns about taxpayers' readiness to support any tax increase, even within the proposed cap. Additionally, the need for transparency in how tax revenues are utilized remains a crucial point, as stakeholders will want assurances that funds are effectively directed towards flood management projects without administrative waste.