Proposing a constitutional amendment to allow the legislature to override a veto of the governor following a legislative session.
If successful, HJR148 would significantly alter the balance of power in Texas state governance. Currently, the governor has considerable control over legislation through veto power, which can be challenging for the legislature to override, especially considering the requirement for a two-thirds majority in both houses. This proposed amendment could empower legislators to enact laws that they believe are crucial for the public good, even in cases where the governor does not agree, potentially leading to a more activist legislative body.
HJR148 is a proposed joint resolution aiming to amend the Texas Constitution to enable the legislature to override a governor's veto after a legislative session. Specifically, the amendment seeks to modify Section 14 of Article IV, allowing for a two-thirds vote by both houses to pass a bill even if it has been vetoed by the governor. The intent is to create a mechanism for legislative checks on executive power, increasing the legislature's authority to enact laws even against the governor's objections when deemed necessary.
The sentiment regarding HJR148 appears to be mixed, reflecting a divide among legislators. Supporters view the bill as a necessary step toward providing a stronger legislative counterweight to the executive branch, advocating for greater democratic accountability. Conversely, opponents argue that it could undermine the role of the governor and disrupt the established system of checks and balances. The debate centers around the appropriate distribution of power between the legislative and executive branches of government.
A notable point of contention arises from concerns that this amendment may lead to legislative overreach, enabling the passage of laws that the governor deems unfit for the state. Critics warn that such a change could diminish the effectiveness of the governor's veto power, which serves as a critical aspect of the state's governance structure. The potential for increased legislative gridlock and politicization of bills also worries some legislators, who fear it might create more divisiveness in an already polarized political environment.