Proposing a constitutional amendment to set the salaries of members of the legislature and the lieutenant governor based on the average public school teacher salary in this state.
If passed, HJR69 would amend Sections 24, 24a, and 28 of Article III and Section 17 of Article IV of the Texas Constitution. The new framework would establish that the salaries of legislative members, including the lieutenant governor, will be determined by the Texas Ethics Commission, based on the average salary of full-time certified classroom teachers from the previous year. This change is set to take effect on September 1, 2024, highlighting a new approach to correlate legislative pay with a crucial public service sector—education—thereby institutionalizing a response to the overall pay scales within state-funded positions.
HJR69 is a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that seeks to set the salaries of members of the Texas legislature and the lieutenant governor based on the average salary of public school teachers in the state. This proposal is aimed at aligning legislative compensation with public education salaries, which proponents argue would reflect the commitment of the legislature to value educators. The proposed change signifies a shift in how legislative salaries are determined, moving from a fixed rate to one more closely tied to public sector salaries.
The sentiment surrounding HJR69 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue this amendment will promote equality, ensuring that the legislature's salaries keep pace with the dedication and compensation of teachers—underscoring the value placed on education by the state. However, detractors might view this linkage as problematic, raising concerns about the financial implications for the state budget, especially if teacher salaries see swings due to budgetary constraints or educational funding changes. This underscores a broader debate regarding legislative compensation and its implications for public service and budget prioritization.
Notable points of contention include concerns over the practicality of tying legislative salaries to teacher salaries. Critics may argue that such a correlation could lead to unpredictable salary fluctuations for legislators, complicating financial planning for state governance. Additionally, the specificity of the resolution regarding current members of the legislature is a point of discussion; the proposed amendment specifically excludes individuals who were serving in the legislature during the 88th Legislature, implying a protective measure to avoid potential immediate pay adjustments that could be politically contentious or unpopular. Ultimately, this joint resolution touches on the broader themes of governance, public service valuation, and fiscal responsibility.