1 | 1 | | By: Middleton S.B. No. 2563 |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | |
---|
4 | 4 | | A BILL TO BE ENTITLED |
---|
5 | 5 | | AN ACT |
---|
6 | 6 | | relating to the admissibility of certain evidence against a |
---|
7 | 7 | | defendant in a criminal case. |
---|
8 | 8 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
---|
9 | 9 | | SECTION 1. Article 38.23, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
---|
10 | 10 | | amended to read as follows: |
---|
11 | 11 | | Art. 38.23. EXCLUSIONARY RULE [EVIDENCE NOT TO BE USED]. |
---|
12 | 12 | | (a) Notwithstanding any other law, evidence that is otherwise |
---|
13 | 13 | | admissible may not be excluded as evidence against a defendant on |
---|
14 | 14 | | the basis that the [No] evidence was obtained [by an officer or |
---|
15 | 15 | | other person] in violation of any provisions of the Constitution or |
---|
16 | 16 | | laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution or laws of the |
---|
17 | 17 | | United States of America, unless: |
---|
18 | 18 | | (1) the evidence was intentionally obtained or |
---|
19 | 19 | | obtained by deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct or |
---|
20 | 20 | | by recurring or systemic negligence, in violation of the |
---|
21 | 21 | | constitution of the United States as interpreted by the United |
---|
22 | 22 | | States Supreme Court; and |
---|
23 | 23 | | (2) a ruling of the United States Supreme Court |
---|
24 | 24 | | compels the exclusion or suppression of that evidence, and there is |
---|
25 | 25 | | no reasonable grounds for distinguishing that ruling factually or |
---|
26 | 26 | | legally.[shall be admitted in evidence against the accused on the |
---|
27 | 27 | | trial of any criminal case. |
---|
28 | 28 | | [In any case where the legal evidence raises an issue |
---|
29 | 29 | | hereunder, the jury shall be instructed that if it believes, or has |
---|
30 | 30 | | a reasonable doubt, that the evidence was obtained in violation of |
---|
31 | 31 | | the provisions of this Article, then and in such event, the jury |
---|
32 | 32 | | shall disregard any such evidence so obtained]. |
---|
33 | 33 | | (b) Notwithstanding any other law, the attorney |
---|
34 | 34 | | representing the state is entitled to an interlocutory appeal under |
---|
35 | 35 | | Article 38.24 of an order under [It is an exception to the |
---|
36 | 36 | | provisions of] Subsection (a) of this article [Article that the |
---|
37 | 37 | | evidence was obtained by a law enforcement officer acting in |
---|
38 | 38 | | objective good faith reliance upon a warrant issued by a neutral |
---|
39 | 39 | | magistrate based on probable cause]. |
---|
40 | 40 | | (c) This article may not be construed to preclude or in any |
---|
41 | 41 | | way limit the ability of a defendant to bring an action for damages |
---|
42 | 42 | | incurred as a result of a violation of the defendant's rights under |
---|
43 | 43 | | the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as made |
---|
44 | 44 | | applicable to the states through the United States Supreme Court's |
---|
45 | 45 | | interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States |
---|
46 | 46 | | Constitution, or Section 9, Article I, Texas Constitution. |
---|
47 | 47 | | SECTION 2. Chapter 38, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
---|
48 | 48 | | amended by adding Article 38.24 to read as follows: |
---|
49 | 49 | | Art. 38.24. INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. (a) Notwithstanding any |
---|
50 | 50 | | other law, the attorney representing the state is entitled to |
---|
51 | 51 | | interlocutory appeal directly to the Texas Court of Criminal |
---|
52 | 52 | | Appeals from any order excluding or suppressing evidence on the |
---|
53 | 53 | | basis that it was obtained in violation of any provisions of the |
---|
54 | 54 | | Constitution or laws of the State of Texas, or of the Constitution |
---|
55 | 55 | | or laws of the United States of America. |
---|
56 | 56 | | (b) The state may appeal under this article even if a ruling |
---|
57 | 57 | | from the United States Supreme Court compels the exclusion or |
---|
58 | 58 | | suppression of the disputed evidence, and the state may appeal for |
---|
59 | 59 | | the purpose of seeking reconsideration of the United States Supreme |
---|
60 | 60 | | Court ruling on a petition for a writ of certiorari. |
---|
61 | 61 | | (c) To appeal under this article, the attorney representing |
---|
62 | 62 | | the state must: |
---|
63 | 63 | | (1) file a notice of appeal not later than the 14th day |
---|
64 | 64 | | after the date of the order under Article 38.23(a); and |
---|
65 | 65 | | (2) if applicable, indicate in the notice of appeal |
---|
66 | 66 | | that: |
---|
67 | 67 | | (A) a ruling from the United States Supreme Court |
---|
68 | 68 | | compels the exclusion or suppression of the disputed evidence; and |
---|
69 | 69 | | (B) the appeal is taken solely for the purpose of |
---|
70 | 70 | | seeking reconsideration of that United States Supreme Court ruling |
---|
71 | 71 | | on a petition for a writ of certiorari. |
---|
72 | 72 | | (d) The filing of a notice of appeal under this article |
---|
73 | 73 | | automatically stays the proceeding until the appeal is fully |
---|
74 | 74 | | resolved. |
---|
75 | 75 | | (e) The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals shall expedite the |
---|
76 | 76 | | consideration of any appeal under this article. |
---|
77 | 77 | | (f) The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals shall summarily |
---|
78 | 78 | | affirm the order, without requesting a briefing on the merits or |
---|
79 | 79 | | holding an oral argument, if it concludes or the attorney |
---|
80 | 80 | | representing the state concedes that a ruling from the United |
---|
81 | 81 | | States Supreme Court compels the exclusion or suppression of the |
---|
82 | 82 | | disputed evidence. |
---|
83 | 83 | | (g) The attorney representing the state may petition for a |
---|
84 | 84 | | writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court from any |
---|
85 | 85 | | decision of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirming the |
---|
86 | 86 | | exclusion or suppression of evidence. If the attorney representing |
---|
87 | 87 | | the state petitions for a writ of certiorari, the stay of |
---|
88 | 88 | | proceedings required by Subsection (d) remains in effect until the |
---|
89 | 89 | | petition is finally disposed. |
---|
90 | 90 | | SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
---|
91 | 91 | | to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective |
---|
92 | 92 | | date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commenced before the |
---|
93 | 93 | | effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the |
---|
94 | 94 | | date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in |
---|
95 | 95 | | effect for that purpose. |
---|
96 | 96 | | SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2023. |
---|