Relating to eliminating certain state-required assessment instruments and certain end-of-course assessment instruments not required by federal law.
Impact
The implications of HB 122 could be significant for the state's education system, particularly in terms of the assessment landscape. Reducing the number of required assessments may alleviate stress on students and educators alike, allowing for a more focused approach to teaching and learning. Additionally, this bill could potentially lead to financial savings for schools by minimizing administrative costs associated with administering these assessments. The change could also reshape how student performance is evaluated in the state, focusing more on essential skills and competencies rather than rote memorization.
Summary
House Bill 122 proposes the elimination of certain state-required assessment instruments as well as specific end-of-course assessment instruments that are not mandated by federal law. This legislative move aims to reduce the testing burden on students and streamline the evaluation process within educational institutions. By targeting assessments that do not align with federal requirements, the bill seeks to foster a more efficient educational environment while maintaining compliance with necessary federal standards.
Contention
However, the discussion surrounding HB 122 is not without controversy. Critics argue that eliminating specific assessments may hinder the ability to monitor and evaluate student progress effectively. There are concerns that removing these instruments could lead to a lack of accountability within the education system, particularly among underperforming schools. Proponents of the bill counter these points by emphasizing that the remaining assessments will still fulfill necessary educational standards, reducing redundancy and enhancing educational efficacy.
Last_action
The bill was filed on August 15, 2025, and underscores a continuing trend of reform in the state's approach to educational assessments, shifting the focus towards a model that prioritizes meaningful evaluations over excessive testing.
Relating to eliminating certain state-required end-of-course assessment instruments not required by federal law and eliminating graduation requirements based on satisfactory performance on certain end-of-course assessment instruments.
Relating to eliminating certain state-required end-of-course assessment instruments not required by federal law and eliminating graduation requirements based on satisfactory performance on certain end-of-course assessment instruments.
Relating to eliminating certain state-required end-of-course assessment instruments not required by federal law and eliminating graduation requirements based on satisfactory performance on certain end-of-course assessment instruments.
Relating to the assessment of public school students and the provision of accelerated instruction to students who fail to achieve satisfactory performance on certain assessment instruments.