Relating to the production, sale, and use of certain agricultural products containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); creating a criminal offense.
Impact
If passed, HB 1674 would result in significant changes to state laws related to agriculture and chemical use, enhancing the state's authority to monitor and control the presence of PFAS in food products. This could lead to increased compliance requirements for producers and sellers, who will need to ensure their products meet the newly established standards. The introduction of a criminal offense for violations further underscores the seriousness of the provisions in the bill, aiming to ensure that agricultural stakeholders prioritize safety and compliance.
Summary
House Bill 1674 seeks to regulate the production, sale, and use of agricultural products containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known for their environmental and health risks. The bill aims to establish guidelines that would limit the presence of PFAS in agricultural operations to safeguard public health and the environment. By laying down strict regulations concerning these substances, the bill reflects a growing concern over the potential adverse effects of PFAS on both human health and ecosystems.
Contention
While proponents of HB 1674 advocate for stronger regulation of harmful chemicals in agriculture, there may be notable opposition from agricultural sectors concerned about the economic implications of the proposed changes. Critics could argue that stringent regulations may impose undue burdens on farmers and food producers, potentially increasing costs and limiting market access for certain products containing PFAS. The discussions around this bill indicate a critical intersection between public health policies and agricultural practices, with debates likely focusing on finding a balance between safety regulations and economic viability.
Identical
Relating to the production, sale, and use of certain agricultural products containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); creating a criminal offense.
Relating to the production and regulation of hemp; providing an administrative penalty; requiring a permit to conduct certain research involving hemp; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.
Relating to offenses involving the manufacture or delivery of certain controlled substances and the enforcement and prevention of those offenses; creating a criminal offense.
Relating to the designation of fentanyl poisoning for purposes of the death certificate and to the criminal penalties for certain controlled substance offenses; increasing a criminal penalty.
Relating to the designation of fentanyl poisoning or fentanyl toxicity for purposes of the death certificate and to the criminal penalties for certain controlled substance offenses; increasing a criminal penalty.
Relating to the production, sale, and use of certain agricultural products containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS); creating a criminal offense.
Requires DEP to study feasibility of using alternative water supply source when perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances exceed maximum contaminant level.
Requires DEP to study feasibility of using alternative water supply source when perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances exceed maximum contaminant level.
Requires DEP and Drinking Water Quality Institute to perform study concerning regulation and treatment of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Requires DEP and Drinking Water Quality Institute to perform study concerning regulation and treatment of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
Requires DEP and Drinking Water Quality Institute to perform study concerning regulation and treatment of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.