Relating to advance directives and health care and treatment decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment; creating a criminal offense.
The proposed changes in HB 2072 would significantly impact existing state laws concerning health care liability claims. Notably, the bill establishes exceptions to the limitations period for claims arising from the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment when these actions violate patient directives. This amendment is intended to bolster protections for patients and their rights in making end-of-life decisions, while also placing legal responsibility on health care providers who do not adhere to established directives.
House Bill 2072 proposes modifications related to advance directives and health care treatment decisions, specifically focusing on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment. One of the primary aims of the bill is to create a clear legal framework that governs the circumstances under which health care providers can act on such directives. The bill seeks to update the Civil Practice and Remedies Code alongside the Health and Safety Code, thereby aligning the legal expectations concerning patient directives with current medical practices and ethical considerations.
Some points of contention regarding HB 2072 might arise from the implications it has for health care providers. The introduction of criminal penalties for violating a patient’s directive raises questions around the accountability of health care professionals and the role of health care facilities in making such critical decisions. While the bill aims to protect patient autonomy, there may be concerns from medical professionals about the potential for increased liabilities and the complexities involved in determining the validity of directives, especially in emergency situations.
Civil Practice And Remedies Code
Health And Safety Code