Relating to the approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees.
Impact
One significant aspect of HB 2225 is the introduction of a five-year limitation on increasing impact fees. Political subdivisions are required to secure a three-fourths majority vote for the approval of any new impact fees. This aims to create a more predictable financial environment for developers and the community, while also reducing potential financial burdens on residents. The provisions pertaining to public hearings ensure that updates on land use assumptions and capital improvement plans involve adequate public engagement, thus promoting local governance accountability.
Summary
House Bill 2225 focuses on amendments to the Local Government Code regarding the approval of land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and the imposition of impact fees. The bill mandates that political subdivisions must enhance public access to information related to land use and capital improvement plans prior to any public hearings. This transparency is intended to allow stakeholders to better understand and participate in the planning processes that affect local communities.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 2225 is mixed. Proponents argue that the bill supports economic development by streamlining the process for land use and ensures that necessary improvements are publicly funded through appropriate impact fees. Critics, however, express concern about the imposition of such fees and the potential for inequitable impacts on lower-income communities, particularly if development costs are passed down to consumers in the form of higher prices. Additionally, there is apprehension about the bill’s effectiveness in genuinely increasing transparency and community involvement.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the adequacy of the requirements for public hearings and the representation of local development interests on advisory committees. There is debate over whether the bill goes far enough to ensure community engagement or if it primarily benefits developers and real estate interests by providing easier access to impose fees. Furthermore, the five-year freeze on increasing impact fees is seen as both a protective measure for financial planning and a possible hindrance to local governments seeking to adapt to growth demands.
Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected
Local Government Code
Chapter 395. Financing Capital Improvements Required By New Development In Municipalities, Counties, And Certain Other Local Governments
Relating to third-party review of plats and property development plans, permits, and similar documents, and the inspection of an improvement related to such a document.
Relating to authorizing an emergency services district to impose an ad valorem tax for the acquisition of land, equipment, or apparatus or the construction of capital improvements.
Relating to the creation of the Montgomery County Water Control and Improvement District No. 6; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Health occupations: health professionals; permanent revocation of license or registration if convicted of sexual conduct under pretext of medical treatment; provide for. Amends sec. 16226 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16226). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4121'23
Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.