Texas House Bill HB2881

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

• Filed: 2/14/25
• Out of House Committee: 5/12/25

Caption

Relating to the enforcement of certain federal laws restricting the acquisition, manufacture, or possession of ammunition in this state.

Impact

The implications of HB 2881 could significantly alter the landscape of state firearm laws. Should the bill be enacted, it would effectively prevent state and local entities from cooperating with federal mandates that are stricter than existing Texas law. This could lead to legal challenges around the balance of federal vs. state authority in gun control measures and could complicate the enforcement of federal regulations concerning firearms and ammunition within state borders.

Summary

House Bill 2881 aims to restrict the enforcement of certain federal laws related to the acquisition, manufacture, or possession of ammunition within the state of Texas. The bill proposes that no state agency, political subdivision, or law enforcement officer can provide assistance to federal agencies regarding regulations that impose restrictions or prohibitions not present in Texas law. This includes measures such as background checks, registration requirements, and limits on ammunition purchases. By centralizing regulatory authority, the bill seeks to fortify the rights of individuals to possess firearms and ammunition as defined under state law.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2881 appears largely supportive among advocates for gun rights, who view the bill as a necessary step towards preserving Second Amendment rights and ensuring the independence of state law from federal overreach. However, opposition from gun control advocates asserts that the bill could exacerbate public safety issues by impeding the enforcement of regulations designed to monitor and control firearm possession. This clash underscores a broader national debate on gun rights and regulation.

Contention

Key points of contention include the potential for increased risk to public safety due to reduced oversight and regulation of firearm possession and their related components. Critics argue that the absence of federal cooperation could lead to a proliferation of unregulated firearms and ammunition, whereas supporters contend that state sovereignty and individual rights should take precedence over federal intervention. This ongoing dispute reflects deep-seated divisions over gun control in the United States, posing significant challenges for lawmakers in reconciling public safety with individual liberties.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Penal Code

• Chapter 1. General Provisions
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section