Texas House Bill HB3129

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

• Filed: 2/20/25
• Out of House Committee: 4/14/25

Caption

Relating to making a donation to the operation game thief fund when applying for a hunting or fishing license.

Impact

If enacted, HB 3129 would amend the Parks and Wildlife Code by integrating a donation option into the framework of license applications. By streamlining the donation process, the bill is designed to increase awareness and convenience for potential contributors, ultimately bolstering the Operation Game Thief Fund. This fund is crucial for supporting programs aimed at wildlife protection and enforcement against poaching. The inclusion of the donation option at multiple points of application will likely encourage more residents to contribute to conservation efforts.

Summary

House Bill 3129 seeks to facilitate donations to the Operation Game Thief Fund during the process of applying for hunting or fishing licenses in Texas. The bill allows applicants to contribute various amounts ($1, $5, $10, or $20) directly through their license applications. This initiative aims to enhance the funding for efforts that combat wildlife crimes, thereby promoting conservation and responsible hunting and fishing practices within the state.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 3129 appears to be supportive, particularly among conservationists and wildlife advocates. Proponents view this bill as a positive step toward increasing public engagement and funding for wildlife protection initiatives. They argue that providing an easy mechanism for donations can significantly enhance resource availability for combatting wildlife crimes. However, there may be some concerns regarding the potential burden on applicants and the effectiveness of the funding in achieving its intended goals.

Contention

While the bill is generally well-received, discussions around SB 3129 may highlight points of contention regarding the effectiveness of voluntary donations in achieving large-scale conservation goals. Critics might raise questions about whether this approach adequately addresses significant funding gaps in wildlife protection or if mandatory fees might be a more effective solution. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the administration of the fund and how the contributions will be utilized to maximize impact on conservation efforts.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Parks And Wildlife Code

• Chapter 12. Powers And Duties Concerning Wildlife
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section