Relating to the liability of owners or operators of certain sources or facilities for unauthorized emissions caused by the criminal act of another.
Impact
The bill's passage would carry significant implications for how liability is assigned in cases of air contamination. By exempting certain facility owners from liability associated with emissions caused by third-party criminal acts, it could limit the accountability of operators in incidents where they played no role in the offending actions. This aspect may be viewed favorably by industry stakeholders concerned about unjust penalties for emissions they did not cause, potentially offering them greater protection from legal repercussions related to environmental regulation compliance.
Summary
House Bill 4815 addresses the liability of owners or operators of specific facilities concerning unauthorized emissions resulting from criminal acts perpetrated by others. This legislative measure amends Section 382.085 of the Health and Safety Code by adding a clause that expressly states these owners or operators are not to be held civilly, administratively, or criminally liable for emissions of air contaminants that occur due to the actions of individuals other than themselves. This provision is targeted at providing relief to businesses and facilities defined under certain Standard Industrial Classification codes, which could potentially be affected by emissions caused by unlawful activities like vandalism or sabotage.
Contention
While the bill aims to address the concerns of facility operators, it could also provoke debate regarding environmental protections and accountability. Critics may argue that such exemptions could disincentivize precautions against emissions and undermine environmental regulation efforts. The concern would be that operators might neglect ensuring adequate security measures to prevent unauthorized emissions, as the risk of liability would be reduced. This could lead to increased air quality issues in areas surrounding these facilities, raising questions about the balance between industry protection and environmental responsibility.
Relating to a limitation on liability in certain suits concerning damages arising from acts or omissions involving a jail or detention facility owned or operated by a county or municipality.
Relating to the amount of foreign emissions of air contaminants in nonattainment areas and the revision of the state implementation plan to account for those emissions.
Relating to the ownership of the pore space underlying the surface of land and to the use of that space for the geologic storage of carbon dioxide; authorizing a fee.
Relating to certain criminal conduct involving agricultural land, including the justified use of force or deadly force to protect agricultural land from that conduct, and to civil liability arising out of certain justified threats to use force or deadly force; creating a criminal offense.