Texas House Bill HB4921

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

• Filed: 3/13/25
• Out of House Committee: 5/6/25

Caption

Relating to restrictions on the use of state funds to benefit private entities that outsource jobs to foreign countries.

Impact

If enacted, HB 4921 would amend the Texas Government Code by adding Chapter 2278, which directly impacts entities that benefit from state funding or tax incentives while engaging in outsourcing practices. By establishing a clear set of guidelines around the use of state resources, the bill aims to bolster local economies and create a positive environment for domestic job growth. The bill applies to state investments made from September 1, 2026, onward, ensuring that any adjustments to the management of state funds align with its stipulations.

Summary

House Bill 4921 seeks to restrict the use of state funds and the provision of tax benefits to private entities that outsource jobs to foreign countries. The bill defines ‘domestic’ entities and establishes parameters under which state governmental entities are prohibited from investing in or purchasing obligations from those that have either created employment opportunities abroad or that have eliminated domestic jobs in the U.S. This legislation is targeted at ensuring state funds are not directed to companies that export jobs overseas, thereby protecting local job markets and promoting domestic job creation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4921 appears to be supportive among lawmakers who advocate for domestic job preservation and wish to hold companies accountable for outsourcing practices. However, there may also be concerns related to the potential economic implications on businesses that rely on outsourcing for operational efficiency. Advocates suggest that stricter regulations are necessary to encourage local employment, while opponents may argue that such restrictions could hinder businesses' competitive edge in a global market.

Contention

One point of contention within the discussions around HB 4921 involves the balance between supporting local jobs and enabling businesses to operate effectively in a global economy. Critics of the bill might express concerns regarding the unintended consequences that could arise from restricting state funds. For instance, businesses that outsource may argue that the bill could limit their ability to innovate and grow, ultimately affecting their contribution to economic development. This conflict illustrates the ongoing debate between protectionist policies and free-market principles in today’s economic landscape.