| 1 | 1 | | 89R5520 MCF-F |
|---|
| 2 | 2 | | By: Thompson H.B. No. 864 |
|---|
| 3 | 3 | | |
|---|
| 4 | 4 | | |
|---|
| 5 | 5 | | |
|---|
| 6 | 6 | | |
|---|
| 7 | 7 | | A BILL TO BE ENTITLED |
|---|
| 8 | 8 | | AN ACT |
|---|
| 9 | 9 | | relating to the procedure for an application for a writ of habeas |
|---|
| 10 | 10 | | corpus based on certain new evidence. |
|---|
| 11 | 11 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|---|
| 12 | 12 | | SECTION 1. Chapter 11, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|---|
| 13 | 13 | | amended by adding Article 11.0732 to read as follows: |
|---|
| 14 | 14 | | Art. 11.0732. PROCEDURE RELATED TO CERTAIN NEW EVIDENCE. |
|---|
| 15 | 15 | | (a) This article applies to evidence, other than evidence |
|---|
| 16 | 16 | | described by Article 11.073(a), that: |
|---|
| 17 | 17 | | (1) was not available to be offered by a convicted |
|---|
| 18 | 18 | | person at the person's trial; and |
|---|
| 19 | 19 | | (2) is material to the person's conviction. |
|---|
| 20 | 20 | | (b) A court may grant a convicted person relief on an |
|---|
| 21 | 21 | | application for a writ of habeas corpus if: |
|---|
| 22 | 22 | | (1) the convicted person files an application, in the |
|---|
| 23 | 23 | | manner provided by Article 11.07, 11.071, or 11.072, containing |
|---|
| 24 | 24 | | specific facts indicating that: |
|---|
| 25 | 25 | | (A) evidence described by Subsection (a) is |
|---|
| 26 | 26 | | currently available and was not available at the time of the |
|---|
| 27 | 27 | | person's trial because the evidence was not ascertainable through |
|---|
| 28 | 28 | | the exercise of reasonable diligence by the person before the date |
|---|
| 29 | 29 | | of or during the person's trial; and |
|---|
| 30 | 30 | | (B) the evidence would be admissible under the |
|---|
| 31 | 31 | | Texas Rules of Evidence at a trial held on the date of the |
|---|
| 32 | 32 | | application; and |
|---|
| 33 | 33 | | (2) the court makes the findings described by |
|---|
| 34 | 34 | | Subdivisions (1)(A) and (B) and also finds that, had the evidence |
|---|
| 35 | 35 | | been presented at trial, on the preponderance of the evidence the |
|---|
| 36 | 36 | | person would not have been convicted. |
|---|
| 37 | 37 | | (c) For purposes of Section 4(a)(1), Article 11.07, Section |
|---|
| 38 | 38 | | 5(a)(1), Article 11.071, and Section 9(a), Article 11.072, a claim |
|---|
| 39 | 39 | | or issue could not have been presented previously in an original |
|---|
| 40 | 40 | | application or in a previously considered application if the claim |
|---|
| 41 | 41 | | or issue is based on evidence described by Subsection (a) that was |
|---|
| 42 | 42 | | not ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable diligence by |
|---|
| 43 | 43 | | the convicted person on or before the date on which the original |
|---|
| 44 | 44 | | application or a previously considered application, as applicable, |
|---|
| 45 | 45 | | was filed. |
|---|
| 46 | 46 | | SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
|---|
| 47 | 47 | | to an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed on or after the |
|---|
| 48 | 48 | | effective date of this Act. An application filed before the |
|---|
| 49 | 49 | | effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the |
|---|
| 50 | 50 | | date the application was filed, and the former law is continued in |
|---|
| 51 | 51 | | effect for that purpose. |
|---|
| 52 | 52 | | SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025. |
|---|