Relating to an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion of the appraised value of a property other than a residence homestead that is the primary residence of an adult who has an intellectual or developmental disability and who must be related to the owner or trustee of the property within a certain degree by consanguinity.
If enacted, HB 972 will amend the Texas Tax Code to include provisions for the new tax exemption, granting financial relief for families. This change means that families looking after adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities can potentially have a significant portion of their property value exempted from ad valorem taxes. The bill is structured to ensure that approved exemptions do not require reapplication every year, reducing administrative burdens on families. However, it does require individuals to maintain their eligibility, with provisions allowing the chief appraiser to request confirmation of current qualifications periodically.
House Bill 972 proposes an exemption from ad valorem taxation for a portion of the appraised value of properties that serve as the primary residence of adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities, provided that these adults are related to the property owner or trustee within a specific degree of consanguinity. The legislation aims to alleviate financial burdens on families caring for such individuals, acknowledging the extra economic challenges they face. The bill specifically targets non-residential homesteads, distinguishing it from existing property tax exemptions for residence homesteads.
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be positive among proponents, who view it as an essential support mechanism for families dealing with the challenges of intellectual and developmental disabilities. The bill's supporters, including various advocacy groups, argue that it provides much-needed relief to families and acknowledges the contribution they make to society by caring for these individuals. Conversely, potential opposition concerns could revolve around the implications of such tax exemptions on overall tax revenues and whether they create disparities among different types of property owners.
Notable points of contention may arise around the stipulations of the bill, particularly the degree of consanguinity required for owners to qualify for the exemption. This requirement might raise questions about fairness and accessibility for families who do not meet the relation criteria, but who still provide care for individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, the reliance on a potential constitutional amendment for the bill to take effect adds a layer of complexity and uncertainty, as its execution hinges on voter approval. Thus, the future of HB 972 may depend as much on public sentiment and engagement as on legislative action.