Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing a limitation on the total amount of ad valorem taxes that a county may impose on the residence homesteads of persons who are disabled or elderly and their surviving spouses.
If enacted, the amendment will modify Section 1-b of Article VIII in the Texas Constitution, thereby affording protection to vulnerable populations—namely the elderly and disabled—against potential property tax increases. The legislation can significantly buffer these individuals from the financial impacts of rising property values and tax assessments, helping maintain their financial stability and housing security. Moreover, the proposed amendment includes provisions for the transfer of tax limitations when a qualifying individual changes residences within the same jurisdiction, further aiding taxpayers in maintaining their benefits.
HJR105 proposes a constitutional amendment aimed at establishing a limitation on the total amount of ad valorem taxes that counties can impose on the residence homesteads of persons who are either disabled or elderly, along with their surviving spouses. Specifically, this amendment seeks to ensure that the property tax burden on qualifying individuals does not increase while they or their eligible spouses remain in their respective homes. To leverage this tax limitation, counties, cities, and junior college districts would need to adopt official actions or hold elections if requested by a certain percentage of voters.
The proposed amendment is designed not only to safeguard the interests of elderly and disabled homeowners in Texas but also to elevate the conversation regarding property tax reform and local governance. By balancing the need for adequate funding of local services and the necessity of economic protection for vulnerable populations, HJR105 places a spotlight on an ongoing discussion about property taxes and their role within the state’s fiscal framework.
One point of contention concerning HJR105 revolves around the mechanisms through which the tax limitations would be enforced. Opponents of similar proposals could argue that restricting tax increases on certain demographics may limit local governments' revenue-generating capacity, potentially impairing local funding for essential services. Proponents counter that protecting these specific groups is crucial, especially given that many elderly and disabled individuals are typically on fixed incomes, making them particularly susceptible to financial strain from rising taxes.