Proposing a constitutional amendment to require a supermajority vote to authorize a political subdivision to issue general obligation bonds.
Impact
The implementation of HJR213, if passed, will have notable implications on state laws surrounding financial governance at the local level. By requiring a supermajority for bond issues, this measure aims to reduce the likelihood of political subdivisions undertaking debt that is not widely sanctioned by the electorate. The change seeks to empower voters, giving them more control over local governmental financial decisions. This is particularly significant in an era where local governments face increasing fiscal pressures and consider hefty financial instruments like bonds to fund public infrastructure.
Summary
HJR213 proposes a constitutional amendment aimed at changing the requirements necessary for political subdivisions to issue general obligation bonds. Specifically, the bill stipulates that a supermajority vote—defined as at least two-thirds of voters—would be required to authorize such bond issuances. This amendment would modify Article XVI of the Texas Constitution by adding Section 62, which restricts the powers of local government entities regarding debt issuance without extensive public approval. The proposed change seeks to enhance fiscal responsibility and ensure that significant financial commitments are supported by a substantial consensus among voters.
Contention
Notably, the bill could stir debate among lawmakers and the public concerning the balance of power between local governments and state oversight. Supporters argue that requiring a supermajority could prevent irresponsible borrowing practices, thereby protecting taxpayers from unexpected financial burdens. Conversely, opponents may view this as a restriction on local autonomy, arguing that the decision-making processes regarding local finances should remain flexible and responsive to specific community needs. Additionally, the timeline for when these new requirements would take effect—January 1, 2026—implies that any impending elections must align with this amendment's stipulations, potentially complicating future fiscal plans for local governments.
Enabled by
Relating to the requirements regarding an election to authorize the issuance of general obligation bonds or to approve an increase in an ad valorem tax rate.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds to provide funding for the construction, expansion, maintenance, and operation of state mental health facilities.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to authorize a political subdivision other than a school district to establish a limitation on the amount of ad valorem taxes that the political subdivision may impose on the residence homesteads of persons who are disabled or elderly and their surviving spouses.
Proposing a constitutional amendment to authorize a political subdivision other than a school district to establish a limitation on the amount of ad valorem taxes that the political subdivision may impose on the residence homesteads of persons who are disabled or elderly and their surviving spouses.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the governing body of a political subdivision to adopt an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion, expressed as a dollar amount, of the market value of an individual's residence homestead.
Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the governing body of a political subdivision other than a school district to adopt an exemption from ad valorem taxation of a portion, expressed as a dollar amount, of the market value of an individual's residence homestead.
Proposing a constitutional amendment establishing a limitation on the total amount of ad valorem taxes that certain political subdivisions may impose on the residence homesteads of persons who are disabled or elderly and their surviving spouses.