Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB2489 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 03/13/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            89R10393 DRS-D
 By: Parker S.B. No. 2489




 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to property owner claims for compensation from certain
 municipalities that fail to enforce certain laws.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Subchapter Z, Chapter 229, Local Government
 Code, is amended by adding Section 229.902 to read as follows:
 Sec. 229.902.  COMPENSATION FOR FAILURE OF MUNICIPALITY TO
 ENFORCE CERTAIN LAWS OR ABATE PUBLIC NUISANCE. (a) In this section:
 (1)  "Fair market value" means the price real property
 will bring when offered for sale by one who desires to sell, but is
 not obliged to sell, and is bought by one who desires to buy, but is
 under no necessity of buying.
 (2)  "Nuisance violation" means a violation of a state
 law or a municipal ordinance or regulation prohibiting public
 camping, obstructing a public thoroughfare, loitering,
 panhandling, public urination or defecation, public consumption of
 an alcoholic beverage, possession or use of a controlled substance,
 or retail theft.
 (3)  "Property owner" means a person:
 (A)  holding fee simple title in real property; or
 (B)  leasing real property for which the person is
 required under the terms of the lease to pay all or part of the
 property taxes on the property or the cost of maintenance or
 insurance for the property.
 (b)  This section applies only to a municipality with a
 population of 900,000 or more.
 (c)  Notwithstanding any other law and except as provided by
 Subsection (d), a property owner may submit a claim to a
 municipality for compensation from the municipality with respect to
 property located in the municipality if the municipality:
 (1)  adopts and follows a policy, pattern, or practice
 of refusing to enforce a state law or a municipal ordinance or
 regulation prohibiting a nuisance violation; or
 (2)  maintains a public nuisance.
 (d)  This section does not apply to:
 (1)  a decision by a municipality to exercise
 prosecutorial discretion not to prosecute a nuisance violation if:
 (A)  the exercise of discretion is based on the
 circumstances of an individual case; and
 (B)  the municipality publishes a public notice of
 the justification for the exercise of prosecutorial discretion
 described by Paragraph (A); or
 (2)  a municipal action required by state or federal
 law.
 (e)  Except as provided by Subsection (f), a property owner
 shall elect the amount of compensation paid to the property owner
 under this section as determined by:
 (1)  the reasonably necessary documented expenses
 incurred by the property owner to mitigate the effect of the
 nuisance violation on the property that is the subject of the claim;
 or
 (2)  the diminution in the fair market value of the
 property owner's real property that is the subject of the claim.
 (f)  The amount of compensation paid to a property owner
 under this section may not exceed the amount of property taxes
 assessed by the municipality on the property that is the subject of
 the claim and paid by the property owner for the tax year in which
 the property owner submits the claim for compensation.
 (g)  Not later than the 30th day after the date a
 municipality receives a written claim for compensation under this
 section, the municipality shall accept or reject the claim and
 notify the property owner.
 (h)  If a municipality accepts a claim for compensation under
 this section, the municipality shall pay the claim in the amount
 determined under Subsection (e).
 (i)  If a municipality rejects a claim for compensation under
 this section or does not respond to a claim within the time period
 prescribed by Subsection (g), the property owner who submitted the
 claim may file an action in a court of competent jurisdiction in the
 county in which the property that is the subject of the claim is
 located.
 (j)  In an action filed under Subsection (i):
 (1)  the court shall determine whether:
 (A)  the property owner is entitled to the
 compensation claimed; and
 (B)  the amount of compensation claimed is
 reasonable; and
 (2)  the municipality has the burden of establishing
 that:
 (A)  the municipal response to the nuisance
 violation that is the basis for the claim for compensation is
 lawful; or
 (B)  the amount of compensation claimed is
 unreasonable.
 (k)  In an action filed under Subsection (i):
 (1)  a municipality may not recover attorney's fees or
 court costs; and
 (2)  a successful claimant may recover reasonable
 attorney's fees and court costs from the municipality.
 (l)  A property owner may not submit more than one claim for
 compensation in the same tax year under this section relating to a
 property affected by a nuisance violation.  A property owner may
 submit another claim pertaining to that property in the following
 tax year if:
 (1)  the municipality has not:
 (A)  stopped the policy, pattern, or practice or
 abated the public nuisance that is the basis for the claim; or
 (B)  entered into an agreement with the property
 owner to settle the claim; or
 (2)  the property owner submitted a claim for
 compensation under this section in the preceding tax year in an
 amount that exceeded the amount described by Subsection (f) for
 that tax year.
 (m)  A property owner is not required to exhaust any other
 remedies that may be available under other law before submitting a
 claim for compensation under this section.
 (n)  A claim for compensation under this section is not
 exclusive and does not preclude a property owner from seeking any
 other remedy that may be available under other law.
 SECTION 2.  Section 229.902, Local Government Code, as added
 by this Act, applies only to a claim for compensation from a
 municipality based on expenses incurred by a property owner on or
 after the effective date of this Act.
 SECTION 3.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.