Us Congress House Bill HB1115

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Report Pass: 3/9/23

Caption

Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act

Impact

The enactment of HB 1115 would significantly impact the regulatory landscape for natural gas pipelines by imposing a structured framework on how federal and state agencies interact when considering applications. It is expected to expedite the approval process for pipeline projects, which could lead to increased infrastructure development and improved energy supply reliability. The bill attempts to reduce the bureaucratic hurdles that have been criticized for slowing down necessary energy projects, aligning with broader federal goals of enhancing energy infrastructure and security.

Summary

House Bill 1115, titled the 'Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act,' is designed to streamline the process for approving natural gas pipeline projects by enhancing coordination among federal and state agencies. The bill mandates the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to take a lead role in approving applications under the Natural Gas Act and to ensure that federal authorizations are processed in a timely and efficient manner. It sets forth strict timelines and reporting requirements for agencies involved in the authorization process, thereby aiming to reduce delays and improve transparency.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1115 appears positive among pro-business and energy sector stakeholders, who view it as a necessary measure to facilitate the growth of natural gas infrastructure. Supporters argue that the bill fosters a more efficient regulatory environment that can support economic development and energy independence. However, opponents express concerns about the potential for reduced environmental oversight and the risk that expedited reviews could undermine thorough assessments of the environmental impacts associated with pipeline constructions.

Contention

The bill has generated notable contention over the appropriate balance between expediting energy project approvals and ensuring thorough environmental reviews. Critics argue that the focus on interagency coordination and expedited timelines may compromise environmental protections and the full consideration of local opposition to projects. Furthermore, there is apprehension that less stringent oversight could lead to long-term detrimental effects on natural ecosystems and community health, prompting calls for more rigorous safeguards within the legislative framework.