No Vaccine Passports Act This bill prohibits certain actions related to vaccine passports and proof of COVID-19 vaccination. Specifically, a federal agency may not issue a vaccine passport, vaccine pass, or other standardized documentation for the purpose of certifying the COVID-19 vaccination status of a U.S. citizen to a third party, or otherwise publish or share any COVID-19 vaccination record of a U.S. citizen or similar health information. Additionally, proof of COVID-19 vaccination shall not be required to access federal or congressional property or services.
If passed, HB 118 would significantly affect the way health information, specifically regarding COVID-19 vaccinations, is managed and shared at a federal level. The prohibition on agencies requiring proof of vaccination for entry to federal properties or accessing federal services establishes a crucial precedent for personal freedoms and limits governmental authority in mandating health-related documentation. The bill seeks to ensure that the vaccination status of citizens does not become a barrier to accessing government services or facilities, promoting an environment without coercive health mandates.
House Bill 118, titled the 'No Vaccine Passports Act', aims to prohibit federal agencies from issuing any type of vaccine passport or similar documentation that certifies the COVID-19 vaccination status of U.S. citizens. The bill specifies that no federal agency is allowed to produce or share vaccination records to third parties, emphasizing privacy and personal health information protection. This legislative measure is particularly relevant in the current climate of public health discussions surrounding citizens' rights and government mandates regarding vaccination status.
There may be notable contention surrounding HB 118, particularly from public health advocates who argue that vaccine passports can enhance safety during health crises. Opponents of the bill may voice concerns regarding potential negative impacts on public health initiatives, questioning how the absence of vaccination proof could affect the management of public spaces during pandemics. Conversely, supporters believe that the bill enhances individual freedoms by preventing government overreach into personal health decisions. The discussions surrounding this bill may reflect broader societal debates on privacy, health rights, and the state's role in public health.