Us Congress House Bill HB211

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/9/23

Caption

COI Elimination Act This bill limits U.S. contributions to the United Nations pertaining to the U.N. Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel. Current law imposes a cap on the annual U.S. contribution to the U.N. budget. The bill lowers that cap by 25% of the amount budgeted for the commission. The bill also states that it shall be U.S. policy to seek the abolition of the commission and combat systemic anti-Israel bias in international bodies.

Impact

If passed, HB211 would amend existing laws regarding U.S. contributions to the United Nations, establishing a new financial cap on contributions specifically related to the aforementioned commission. This change reflects a shift in the U.S. stance on international accountabilities and could lead to decreased funding for operations that the bill's proponents argue unfairly target Israel. The implications of these changes may affect not only diplomatic relations but also the U.S.’s reputation on the world stage regarding human rights investigations.

Summary

House Bill 211, also referred to as the COI Elimination Act, proposes significant changes in the United States’ approach to international organizations, specifically targeting the United Nations. The bill aims to abolish the United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory and reduce American funding to this commission by 25%. This initiative aligns with a broader policy statement asserting the U.S. intention to combat perceived anti-Israel bias within international bodies, particularly the United Nations Human Rights Council.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB211 involve debates on foreign diplomacy and humanitarian efforts. Critics of the bill contend that reducing funding to the Commission of Inquiry and endorsing the abolition of the commission undermines crucial oversight of human rights issues in the occupied territories. They argue that it sends a message that the U.S. is uncommitted to accountability and justice in situations of conflict, particularly in relation to Israel and Palestine. Conversely, supporters claim that the legislation is a necessary move to protect Israel from biased scrutiny and unfounded allegations in international forums.