Us Congress House Bill HB3746

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/29/23
• Refer: 5/29/23
• Refer: 5/30/23
• Engrossed: 5/31/23
• Enrolled: 6/3/23
• Passed: 6/3/23
• Chaptered: 6/3/23

Caption

Administrative Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023

Impact

If implemented, HB 3746 will have a significant impact on how federal agencies operate, particularly in terms of their administrative actions that could lead to increased government spending. Agencies will need to demonstrate clear compensatory measures for any proposals that would raise expenditures, which is aimed at preventing a growth in the budget deficit. Additionally, this bill mandates agencies to report on their compliance with these new requirements, enhancing transparency in government spending and making it necessary for them to carefully evaluate their financial decisions.

Summary

House Bill 3746, known as the Administrative Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2023, aims to establish stricter budget enforcement mechanisms related to federal spending. This legislation introduces provisions that require federal agencies to adhere to pay-as-you-go principles when considering administrative actions that may affect direct spending. The intent is to curb administrative costs by making sure that all new spending is offset by reductions elsewhere or increases in revenue, thus maintaining fiscal discipline in government expenditures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 3746 appears to be mixed. Supporters, primarily fiscal conservatives, argue that the bill reinforces necessary budgetary constraints that can help reduce the national debt and ensure that taxpayer dollars are used effectively. Critics, however, contend that the bill could hinder essential government functions and services by restricting agencies from acting swiftly in a time of need. This sentiment reflects a broader debate over fiscal responsibility versus the need for government agility in response to public demands.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HB 3746 include concerns about its potential to limit critical discretionary funding and slow down necessary administrative processes. Some lawmakers fear that while the intention of promoting fiscal responsibility is commendable, the stringent requirements may lead to bureaucratic bottlenecks that hinder operational efficiency. Furthermore, there are apprehensions that this bill may disproportionately affect programs that require immediate funding, such as disaster response and social services, potentially putting vulnerable populations at risk.