Endangered Species Transparency and Reasonableness Act of 2023
Impact
The implications of HB 518 extend to how state and federal agencies interact regarding species management. By requiring the availability of data that underpins decisions, the bill could potentially lead to increased scrutiny and accountability concerning the protection measures for endangered species. Furthermore, the bill encourages the consideration of state, tribal, and local information in federal listings, which could enhance the collaborative efforts between different levels of government in biodiversity conservation.
Summary
House Bill 518, known as the Endangered Species Transparency and Reasonableness Act of 2023, seeks to enhance transparency regarding decisions made under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The bill mandates the publication of the scientific and commercial data that informs decisions about whether species are listed as endangered or threatened, reinforcing public access to this information. Notably, it allows state governors or agencies to request that such information not be disclosed if it conflicts with state laws concerning privacy or security. This approach aims to balance transparency with local legislative frameworks.
Contention
Controversially, the bill has prompted discussions among lawmakers and environmental advocates about the potential ramifications of increased transparency in decision-making processes. Supporters argue that greater access to data will foster better-informed public discourse and enable local populations to participate more effectively in conservation efforts. Conversely, critics caution that mandated disclosures could lead to delays in critical conservation actions, as agencies may become bogged down in regulatory compliance and public outcry over data, especially in sensitive cases involving private interests or national security concerns.
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require consideration of economic impact in making a listing decision with respect to the list of threatened and endangered species, and for other purposes.
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide that artificially propagated animals shall be treated the same under that Act as naturally propagated animals, and for other purposes.
Forest Information Reform Act or the FIR Act This bill specifies that neither the Department of Agriculture nor the Department of the Interior may be required to reinitiate consultation on a land management plan when a species is listed as threatened or endangered, critical habitat is designated, or new information concerning a listed species or critical habitat becomes available.