CASE–IT Act Curbing Abuse and Saving Expression In Technology Act
The proposed amendments introduce a mechanism for civil actions against dominant providers who engage in content moderation policies that are not aligned with First Amendment standards. By doing so, HB573 aims to expose large digital platforms to greater liability for adverse actions against user-generated content, hence, significantly altering the legal landscape surrounding content moderation and the responsibilities of internet service providers. This could usher in a shift towards more stringent content regulation practices, particularly in terms of protecting minors from harmful material.
House Bill 573, known as the Curbing Abuse and Saving Expression In Technology Act (CASE-IT Act), seeks to amend Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934. This legislation aims to limit the immunity of providers and users of interactive computer services in specific circumstances, particularly in relation to illegal or harmful content. The bill delineates exceptions to immunity, particularly for providers that contribute to or facilitate illegal online content, helping to hold them responsible for their role in content dissemination.
The debate surrounding HB573 centers around the potential implications for free speech and the operational burden on digital platforms. Proponents argue that the bill will enhance accountability in the face of growing concerns over harmful online content, especially targeted towards minors. Critics, however, fear it could lead to over-censorship and stifle free expression by compelling platforms to over-moderate content to avoid legal repercussions. The tension between protecting users and maintaining a free and open discourse online represents a core point of contention in the discussions around this legislation.