Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HB7592

Introduced
3/8/24  
Refer
3/8/24  
Refer
3/11/24  
Report Pass
4/30/24  

Caption

To direct the Librarian of Congress to promote the more cost-effective, efficient, and expanded availability of the Annotated Constitution and pocket-part supplements by replacing the hardbound versions with digital versions.

Impact

The adoption of HB 7592 would lead to a significant change in how the Annotated Constitution is disseminated. By permitting only digital editions following the completion of specific Supreme Court terms, the bill not only reduces physical printing demands but also aims to ensure that these critical documents are continuously available online. The move away from hardbound versions to digital formats is expected to decrease costs associated with printing and distribution while improving access for lawmakers and the public alike.

Summary

House Bill 7592 aims to enhance the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of the Annotated Constitution and related supplements by transitioning from hardbound formats to digital versions. The bill directs the Librarian of Congress to facilitate the creation and availability of these digital documents, thus promoting their broader use among the public and Congress. This legislative move seeks to modernize the way fundamental legal texts are presented and accessed, aligning with contemporary technological trends and user needs.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 7592 appears to be largely positive, particularly among pro-digitalization advocates who argue that facilitating access to essential legal documents online represents a progressive step forward. Supporters believe it would enhance public engagement with constitutional issues and resources. However, there may also be concerns among traditionalists who prefer physical copies of such important texts, emphasizing the need to ensure that digital formats do not marginalize those who are less tech-savvy or have limited access to the internet.

Contention

Despite the overall support for the digital transition, there may be notable points of contention regarding the implementation of HB 7592. Concerns over data security, preservation of the historical integrity of texts, and the potential digital divide could become focal issues. Critics might question whether the move to a purely digital format may exclude certain demographic groups and whether adequate resources will be allocated to ensure that all individuals can access these legal documents without technological barriers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

US HB1234

This bill replaces the requirement for the Library of Congress to prepare hardbound versions of the Constitution Annotated and supplements with a requirement for the Library to instead prepare digital versions and publish them online.The new requirement applies to the supplement after the Supreme Court term beginning October 2025 and all subsequent editions.

US HB8630

SPEED through Screening Act Supporting Passengers with Efficient and Effective Detection through Screening Act

US HB7593

Modernizing the Congressional Research Service’s Access to Data Act

US HB9584

Digital Citizenship and Media Literacy Act

US SB4390

No Foreign Emoluments Without Congressional Consent Act

US HJR118

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to temporarily fill vacancies in the House of Representatives to further the continuity of Congress.

US HB8597

Transparency in Government Act of 2024 PAST Act of 2024 Promoting Accountability and Security in Transitions Act of 2024

US SB2342

Border Drone Threat Assessment Act Intelligence Community Efficiency and Effectiveness Act of 2025

US HB1087

United States Colored Troops Congressional Gold Medal Act

US HB9467

American Energy Efficiency Act of 2024

Similar Bills

CA AJR27

Convention of states for proposing an amendment to the United States Constitution: federal balanced budget.

US SR107

A resolution recognizing the expiration of the Equal Rights Amendment proposed by Congress in March 1972, and observing that Congress has no authority to modify a resolution proposing a constitutional amendment after the amendment has been submitted to the States or after the amendment has expired.

AL SJR57

RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

AL HJR104

RESCINDING ALL PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS OF THE ALABAMA LEGISLATURE WHICH REQUEST CONGRESS TO CALL A CONVENTION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

TX SJR1

Urging the Congress of the United States to propose and submit to the states for ratification a federal balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States and, in the event that Congress does not submit such an amendment on or before December 31, 2011, applying to Congress to call a convention for the specific and exclusive purpose of proposing an amendment to that constitution to provide, in the absence of a national emergency and on a two-thirds vote of Congress, for a federal balanced budget and requesting that the legislatures of each of the several states that compose the United States apply to Congress to call a convention to propose such an amendment.

NJ AJR207

Urges Congress to call constitutional convention to consider reproductive health care rights.

NJ AJR97

Urges U.S. Congress to pass Equal Rights Amendment.

NJ AJR72

Urges U.S. Congress to pass Equal Rights Amendment.