Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.
Impact
If enacted, HCR86 asserts that the introduction of a carbon tax could lead to a decrease in overall economic growth. With fossil fuels accounting for approximately 80 percent of energy consumption in the U.S., the resolution warns that the resulting cost increases could also elevate prices for all manufactured goods, thereby straining consumers further. Furthermore, the resolution posits that a carbon tax could impair America's global competitiveness, causing industries to suffer and potentially leading to a decline in domestic energy production that has previously been bolstered by innovation and investment.
Summary
HCR86 is a concurrent resolution expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would have detrimental effects on the United States economy. The resolution highlights concerns that a carbon tax could increase energy prices significantly, affecting essential costs for families and consumers, including gasoline, electricity, and home heating oil. It emphasizes that such a tax is likely to disproportionately impact low-income individuals, the elderly, and those on fixed incomes, raising questions about fairness and equity in energy pricing. Additionally, the resolution argues that a carbon tax could result in job losses, as businesses might relocate overseas to avoid the tax burden.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around HCR86 appears to be mostly negative regarding the implementation of a carbon tax. Supporters of the resolution, primarily from the Republican party, argue it is a necessary stance against governmental overreach in taxation that could harm American families and the economy. However, there are concerns raised by opponents outside the documented discussion, who argue that failing to put a price on carbon emissions may have longer-term detrimental environmental effects.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding HCR86 is the balance between economic growth and environmental responsibility. While proponents assert that the resolution effectively protects families and businesses from heightened taxation that could stifle growth, critics may assert the need for environmental protections to mitigate climate change. The resolution's passage indicates a legislative position against potential measures that could impact energy industries, showcasing the complex relationship between economic interests and environmental policy.
Related
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1023) to repeal section 134 of the Clean Air Act, relating to the greenhouse gas reduction fund; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1121) to prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6009) to require the Director of the Bureau of Land Management to withdraw the proposed rule relating to fluid mineral leases and leasing process, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 86) expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 987) denouncing the harmful, anti-American energy policies of the Biden administration, and for other purposes; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R 7023) to amend section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to codify certain regulatory provisions relating to nationwide permits for dredged or fill material, and for other purposes.
Expressing the sense of Congress that public health professionals should be commended for their dedication and service to the United States on Public Health Thank You Day, November 20, 2023.
Expressing the sense of Congress that public health professionals should be commended for their dedication and service to the United States on Public Health Thank You Day, November 25, 2024.
Recognizing that the climate crisis disproportionately affects the health, economic opportunity, and fundamental rights of children, expressing the sense of Congress that leadership by the United States is still urgently needed to address the climate crisis, and acknowledging the need of the United States to develop a national, comprehensive, science-based, and just climate recovery plan to phase out fossil fuel emissions, protect and enhance natural carbon sequestration, and put the United States on a path toward stabilizing the climate system.
Expressing the sense of Congress that there is a climate emergency which demands a massive-scale mobilization to halt, reverse, and address its consequences and causes.
Expressing the sense of Congress that tax-exempt fraternal benefit societies have historically provided and continue to provide critical benefits to the people and communities of the United States.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that hydropower is a vital component to an all-of-the-above approach to energy development which is critical to United States national security.
Expressing the sense of Congress that wrongfully or unjustly deported people who have established significant ties through years of life in the United States deserve a chance to come home to reunite with loved ones through a fair and central process within the Department of Homeland Security.
Expressing the sense of Congress that Trump administration tariffs on Mexico and Canada are in violation of the United States of America-Mexico-Canada Agreement.