Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HR521

Introduced
6/16/23  

Caption

Censuring Adam Schiff, Representative of the 30th Congressional District of California.

Impact

The resolution directly affects the perception of trust and integrity within the House of Representatives. By formally censuring a sitting member, it sends a message regarding accountability and the expectations placed on elected officials. Additionally, it serves as a political tool that may influence public opinion and future electoral outcomes, especially in light of Schiff's role in major national discussions about intelligence and impeachment processes.

Summary

HR521 is a resolution that seeks to censure Adam Schiff, the Representative of California's 30th Congressional District. The resolution outlines several allegations against Schiff, accusing him of misleading the American public through various statements regarding alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, as well as dishonorable conduct during his tenure as Chairman of the Intelligence Committee. Specifically, it highlights instances where Schiff purportedly misrepresented classified information and misled the public about key events related to the impeachment of President Trump. The censure is not just a formal reprimand but also includes a call for an ethics investigation into his actions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR521 appears to be polarized, reflecting broader partisan divides. Supporters of the resolution, primarily from the Republican party, argue that it holds Schiff accountable for his alleged dishonesty and misuses of power. They view the censure as a necessary step in upholding the credibility of Congress. Conversely, opponents of the resolution, including Democrats, contend it is a politically motivated attack aimed at discrediting Schiff, suggesting that the censure is unwarranted and detrimental to Congress's integrity as a whole.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HR521 include the partisan nature of the allegations, with critics pointing out that such censure resolutions can set dangerous precedents for political retribution. The resolution's provisions for an ethics investigation into Schiff further complicate the matter, as it raises concerns about the use of congressional power to target political adversaries. The fierce debates surrounding this bill reflect underlying tensions in national politics and the ongoing struggles over narratives related to past administrations and investigations.

Companion Bills

US HR437

Related Censuring and condemning Adam Schiff, Representative of California's 30th Congressional District.

US HR489

Related Censuring and condemning Adam Schiff, Representative of California's 30th Congressional District.

US HR512

Related Censuring and condemning Adam Schiff, Representative of California's 30th Congressional District.

Previously Filed As

US HR489

Censuring and condemning Adam Schiff, Representative of California's 30th Congressional District.

US HR512

Censuring and condemning Adam Schiff, Representative of California's 30th Congressional District.

US HR437

Censuring and condemning Adam Schiff, Representative of California's 30th Congressional District.

US HR623

Censuring Paul Gosar, Representative of the 9th Congressional District of Arizona.

US HR606

Censuring Pramila Jayapal, Representative of the 7th Congressional District of Washington.

US HR64

PENCIL Resolution Preventing Extreme Negligence with Classified Information Licenses Resolution

US HR970

Censuring Representative Elise Stefanik of the 21st Congressional District of New York.

US HR626

Censuring Representative Andy Ogles.

US HR610

Censuring Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene.

US HR1500

Censuring Representative Glen Clay Higgins of the 3rd Congressional District of Louisiana.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.