Supporting Healthy Pregnancy Act of 2023
If enacted, the Supporting Healthy Pregnancy Act would modify the existing regulations around child support under the Social Security Act. It mandates that states enforce a child support obligation for biological fathers related to pregnancy-associated medical expenses, which is expected to provide mothers with additional financial support during a crucial time. This will likely result in a shift in how child support is calculated and enforced, ensuring that mothers are compensated for medical costs that arise prior to the birth of the child.
SB3485, known as the Supporting Healthy Pregnancy Act of 2023, proposes to amend Title IV of the Social Security Act. The bill introduces a requirement for biological fathers to contribute at least 50% of the reasonable out-of-pocket medical expenses incurred by the mother during pregnancy and delivery. This includes health insurance premiums, deductibles, and other related costs. The aim of the legislation is to address financial disparities during the pregnancy period by establishing a clearer obligation on the part of biological fathers regarding child support for these specific expenses.
One point of contention within the bill is its explicit exclusion of expenses related to abortion from the definition of medical expenses. Critics argue that this exclusion might provoke debates about reproductive rights and the extent to which child support should cover pregnancy-related costs. Furthermore, the bill's clarity in establishing a father's financial responsibility during pregnancy may face opposition from groups advocating for paternal rights, as it emphasizes a state enforceable obligation which could lead to potential legal disputes regarding support assessments.
In the discussions surrounding SB3485, supporters highlight its potential to benefit mothers and provide a more balanced financial responsibility between parents. However, dissenting voices raise concerns regarding the implications of mandated payments, especially considering varying circumstances of biological fathers. These debates could shape the eventual outcome and implementation of the bill as it proceeds through Congress.