Every Supreme Court Nominee Deserves Timely Consideration Act
Impact
The bill's provisions limit debate on a nomination to a maximum of 30 hours, split evenly between supporters and opponents of the nominee. This limitation is designed to prevent lengthy discussions that could delay the confirmation process. Furthermore, it restricts various motions that might traditionally be brought to the floor during the nomination debate, which proponents argue will lead to a more efficient process. With these changes, SB859 could significantly alter the way nominations occur, reducing the leverage committees hold over the nomination process.
Summary
SB859, titled the 'Every Supreme Court Nominee Deserves Timely Consideration Act', aims to streamline the nomination process for Supreme Court justices. The bill establishes a framework that allows for expedited consideration of nominees by reducing the time Senate committees have to report on nominations. Under this bill, if a nomination has not been reported after 60 days, any senator can initiate a discharge petition to move the nomination forward, bypassing committee delays. This aspect of the bill is intended to ensure that nominees do not face prolonged waiting periods, which can be politically motivated.
Contention
Despite its intent to expedite nominations, SB859 has faced criticism from opponents who argue that the bill undermines the Senate's role in the confirmation process. Critics contend that imposing strict limitations on debate and committee reviews could lead to a lack of thorough vetting of nominees. They warn that this could result in justices being confirmed without adequate scrutiny of their qualifications or judicial philosophies. Supporters defend the bill, asserting that the current process is often politicized and leads to unnecessary delays, calling for a balance between expediency and due diligence.
A resolution amending the Standing Rules of the Senate to authorize the Majority Leader to move to proceed to the en bloc consideration of certain nominations.
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 140) to amend title 5, United States Code, to prohibit Federal employees from advocating for censorship of viewpoints in their official capacity, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 27) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Revised Definition of 'Waters of the United States'"; and providing for consideration of the bill (S. 619) to require the Director of National Intelligence to declassify information relating to the origin of COVID-19, and for other purposes.