Us Congress Senate Bill SJR103

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/23/24
• Refer: 7/23/24

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet; Restoring Internet Freedom".

Impact

The implications of SJR103 are multifaceted, particularly around how state laws concerning internet access and regulation may evolve. By disapproving this FCC rule, Congress could potentially enable a more deregulated internet environment. This could lead to increased variability in how internet service providers (ISPs) manage access to content and services, impacting both consumers and businesses relying on consistent internet access. The resolution can affect local and state initiatives to enforce fair internet practices and could exaggerate existing disparities in access among different populations, especially in rural or underserved areas.

Summary

SJR103 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule set forth by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) concerning the safeguarding and securing of the open internet. This rule, presented for congressional disapproval, relates to the restoration of internet freedom and encompasses regulatory frameworks that have been debated extensively in the context of net neutrality. The resolution indicates a significant push from certain lawmakers to limit FCC authority in overseeing internet service provisions and to potentially rollback certain protections that aim to maintain an open and accessible internet for all users.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SJR103 include the ongoing debate about net neutrality and the role of federal versus local governance in regulating internet services. Proponents of the resolution argue that it restores freedoms and prevents government overreach in internet regulation, while opponents express concern that it may facilitate discriminatory practices among ISPs, undermining the principle of equal access to online resources. The discussions reflect deep partisan divides, with Republican lawmakers generally supporting the resolution and Democratic lawmakers often opposing it due to perceived risks to consumer protection and equitable access.