A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.
The passage of SJR113 would not only block this specific sale but also challenge broader foreign military sales policies regarding Israel and potentially prompt discussions about U.S. military assistance and support for allies. This could have significant implications for U.S.-Israel relations, depending on the outcomes of congressional debates and public opinion on military expenditures and foreign relations. If enacted, it would emphasize Congress's role in scrutinizing significant military deals, particularly when they involve controversial arms sales.
SJR113 is a joint resolution introduced to provide congressional disapproval of a proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel. This particular proposed sale involves the transfer of substantial amounts of military equipment, including 50,400 M933A1 120mm High Explosive mortar cartridges, along with technical support and logistics services. The resolution serves as a formal mechanism for Congress to express its disapproval of such sales under the Arms Export Control Act, which requires notification to Congress regarding international arms transactions. The resolution was introduced in the Senate by Senators Sanders, Welch, and Merkley on September 25, 2024, and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
The resolution faced notable contention during the legislative process. A vote was held on November 20, 2024, where SJR113 garnered 19 votes in favor and 78 against, reflecting a substantial opposition among Congress members. Many supporters of the military sale argue that such sales are integral to maintaining security alliances and countering threats in the region. On the other hand, opponents of the sale, which SJR113 represents, raise concerns about the implications of increased military capabilities for Israel, particularly regarding their use in ongoing conflicts and military operations. This suggests a divide within Congress over U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and the associated ethical considerations of arms trade.