Us Congress Senate Bill SJR31

Us Congress 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/8/23
• Refer: 6/8/23

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Federal 'Good Neighbor Plan' for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards".

Impact

The passage of SJR31 would effectively nullify the EPA's rule, thus removing federal regulatory influences that set specific air quality standards related to ozone levels. This action would likely lead to less stringent environmental controls in areas affected by ozone pollution, which could have far-reaching implications for air quality and public health standards across the United States. Notably, it raises concerns amongst environmental advocates regarding potential increases in pollution and the consequences for vulnerable populations in affected regions.

Summary

SJR31 is a joint resolution aimed at providing congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) known as the 'Federal Good Neighbor Plan' for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards. This resolution highlights a significant legislative effort to challenge the EPA's authority and its implementation of rules regarding ozone levels and their management. The supporters of this resolution, primarily from the Republican Party, argue that the EPA's regulations can be overly burdensome and exceed its intended jurisdiction, impacting local economies negatively.

Contention

Debate surrounding SJR31 reflects a deep divide in opinions regarding environmental policy. Proponents argue for the necessity of deregulation to foster economic growth and reduce governmental overreach. Conversely, opponents argue that disapproving EPA regulations undercuts essential measures required to maintain healthy air quality and combat the adverse effects of ozone pollution. The resolution's focus on disapproving a specific EPA rule opens up broader discussions on the balance between environmental regulations and economic activities, with proponents and opponents likely finding themselves engaged in fierce debates as the bill moves through the legislative process.