Improving Science in Chemical Assessments Act This bill modifies procedures related to specified chemical assessments performed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Specifically, chemical hazard identification and dose response assessments must be performed by the appropriate EPA program office (they are currently performed by the Integrated Risk Information System program). Additionally, the bill requires the EPA to establish a steering committee to ensure there is no duplication of effort by relevant program offices in conducting covered assessments.
If enacted, this legislation would fundamentally change how toxic assessments are carried out in the United States, allowing for a more decentralized approach within the EPA. Instead of a one-size-fits-all methodology for chemical assessments, the bill fosters tailored evaluations based on scientific evidence relevant to each program office's specific focus—be it air, water, land management, or pollution prevention. Such a shift could enhance the accuracy and responsiveness of the assessments relevant to the public health and environmental standards.
House Bill 123, also known as the Improving Science in Chemical Assessments Act, seeks to enhance the assessment of chemical toxicity by transferring specific responsibilities to relevant program offices within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The bill mandates that certain evaluations regarding the toxicity of chemical substances, which were previously conducted through the Integrated Risk Information System, be delegated to these program offices. This change is aimed at ensuring assessments are more specific to the needs and priorities of the various EPA offices while integrating all scientific evidence available for more robust evaluations.
Notable points of contention surrounding HB 123 include the potential bureaucratic implications of splitting assessments among various program offices. Critics may argue that this could lead to inconsistencies and duplicate efforts or that the focus may become fragmented, ultimately diminishing the quality of assessments. Supporters, on the other hand, contend that the bill would improve the quality and relevance of scientific assessments by ensuring they align directly with the operational focus and expertise of each EPA office.
The act requires the establishment of a steering committee within the EPA to oversee the coordination of assessments, ensuring that efforts are consolidated and duplication is minimized. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of adhering to scientific standards throughout this process, ensuring that third-party assessments undergo independent reviews and reflect the best available science, thereby enhancing the transparency and trust in the chemical assessment process.