Us Congress House Bill HB2654

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/25
• Refer: 4/3/25

Caption

Lifesaving Gear for Police Act of 2025

Impact

If passed, HB2654 would significantly impact how state and local law enforcement agencies acquire and utilize federal surplus equipment. By allowing for the more straightforward transfer of such resources, the legislation aims to enhance the operational capabilities of local law enforcement. Proponents of the bill argue that these resources are essential for maintaining public safety and ensuring that police forces can effectively respond to various incidents. The bill further mandates the return or reissue of any equipment that was previously recalled or seized under the now-nullified regulations, ensuring that agencies have access to necessary tools for law enforcement activities.

Summary

House Bill 2654, known as the Lifesaving Gear for Police Act of 2025, seeks to prohibit the enforcement of certain regulations that limit the sale, donation, and transfer of federal government property to state and local law enforcement agencies. Notably, it targets regulations stemming from Executive Orders 13688 and 14074, which were designed to impose stricter guidelines and oversight on the acquisition of military surplus equipment by local police forces. The bill emphasizes that any such regulations have no force or effect unless they are enacted into law by Congress, effectively nullifying previous executive actions related to this issue.

Contention

The bill is likely to face contention based on concerns about the militarization of local police forces. Critics might argue that easing access to federal property could lead to an increase in aggressive policing tactics, undermining community trust and safety. Additionally, there are ongoing debates surrounding the accountability of law enforcement agencies in their usage of military-grade equipment and how it aligns with community needs and oversight. As such, discussions around the bill might highlight a divide between those who prioritize law enforcement effectiveness and those advocating for civil liberties and neighborhood safety.