Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HCR12 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 02/14/2025

                            IV 
119THCONGRESS 
1
STSESSION H. CON. RES. 12 
Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act. 
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
FEBRUARY13, 2025 
Mr. W
OMACK(for himself, Ms. CASTORof Florida, Mrs. HOUCHIN, Mr. 
B
ENTZ, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. LUTTRELL, Mr. LALOTA, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. 
B
OST, Mr. COSTA, Mr. FINSTAD, Ms. FOXX, Mr. MOYLAN, Ms. MCCOL-
LUM, Mr. MRVAN, Mr. CISCOMANI, Mr. SESSIONS, Ms. SEWELL, Mr. 
F
LOOD, Mrs. MILLERof Illinois, Mr. EZELL, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. 
M
OULTON, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. GARBARINO, Ms. STANSBURY, Mr. LAWLER, 
Ms. M
ALOY, Mr. KELLYof Pennsylvania, Mr. CLYDE, Mr. ALFORD, Mr. 
S
COTTFRANKLINof Florida, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. KENNEDYof New York, 
Mr. N
EWHOUSE, Mr. FEENSTRA, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BALDERSON, Mr. 
K
EATING, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Ms. DELACRUZ, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. WITT-
MAN, Mr. GOLDENof Maine, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. ROGERSof Alabama, Mr. 
D
AVIDSON, Mr. MEUSER, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. BEANof Florida, Mr. TUR-
NERof Ohio, Mr. RULLI, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. VASQUEZ, Mr. BISHOP, Ms. 
B
UDZINSKI, Mr. DAVIDSCOTTof Georgia, Mr. THANEDAR, Mr. AMODEI 
of Nevada, Mrs. M
ILLERof West Virginia, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. DAVISof 
North Carolina, Mr. L
AMALFA, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. 
H
UIZENGA, Mr. CARTERof Louisiana, Mr. COLE, Ms. DAVIDSof Kansas, 
Mr. S
MITHof Nebraska, Mrs. SYKES, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. TIMMONS, 
Mr. C
OMER, Mr. KEAN, Mr. THOMPSONof Mississippi, Mr. AUSTIN 
S
COTTof Georgia, Mr. MORAN, Mr. YAKYM, Mr. VALADAO, Mr. 
G
ROTHMAN, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. VAN 
O
RDEN, Mrs. MCIVER, Mr. PERRY, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. CAREY, Mr. 
E
LLZEY, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. LATTA, Ms. 
V
ANDUYNE, Mr. GUEST, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. MANN, Mr. WEBER 
of Texas, Mr. W
EBSTERof Florida, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. KUSTOFF, Mr. 
F
ALLON, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. DELUZIO, Ms. HAGEMAN, Mr. VAN 
D
REW, Mr. SORENSEN, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. 
B
AUMGARTNER, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. BURLISON, and Mr. PFLUGER) sub-
mitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Feb 13, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6652 E:\BILLS\HC12.IH HC12
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS 2 
•HCON 12 IH 
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 
Supporting the Local Radio Freedom Act. 
Whereas the United States enjoys broadcasting and sound re-
cording industries that are the envy of the world, due to 
the symbiotic relationship that has existed among these 
industries for many decades; 
Whereas, for nearly a century, Congress has rejected re-
peated calls by the recording industry to impose a per-
formance fee on local radio stations for simply playing 
music on the radio and upsetting the mutually beneficial 
relationship between local radio and the recording indus-
try; 
Whereas local radio stations provide free publicity and pro-
motion to the recording industry and performers of music 
in the form of radio air play, interviews with performers, 
introduction of new performers, concert promotions, and 
publicity that promotes the sale of music, concert tickets, 
ring tones, music videos and associated merchandise; 
Whereas Congress found that ‘‘the sale of many sound re-
cordings and the careers of many performers benefited 
considerably from airplay and other promotional activities 
provided by both noncommercial and advertiser-sup-
ported, free over-the-air broadcasting’’; 
Whereas local radio broadcasters provide tens of thousands of 
hours of essential local news and weather information 
during times of national emergencies and natural disas-
ters, as well as public affairs programming, sports, and 
hundreds of millions of dollars of time for public service 
announcements and local fundraising efforts for worthy 
charitable causes, all of which are jeopardized if local 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Feb 13, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HC12.IH HC12
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS 3 
•HCON 12 IH 
radio stations are forced to divert revenues to pay for a 
new performance fee; 
Whereas there are many thousands of local radio stations 
that will suffer severe economic hardship if any new per-
formance fee is imposed, as will many other small busi-
nesses that play music including bars, restaurants, retail 
establishments, sports and other entertainment venues, 
shopping centers and transportation facilities; and 
Whereas the hardship that would result from a new perform-
ance fee would hurt American businesses, and ultimately 
the American consumers who rely on local radio for news, 
weather, and entertainment; and such a performance fee 
is not justified when the current system has produced the 
most prolific and innovative broadcasting, music, and 
sound recording industries in the world: Now, therefore, 
be it 
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 1
concurring), That Congress should not impose any new 2
performance fee, tax, royalty, or other charge relating to 3
the public performance of sound recordings on a local 4
radio station for broadcasting sound recordings over the 5
air, or on any business for such public performance of 6
sound recordings. 7
Æ 
VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:51 Feb 13, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\HC12.IH HC12
ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS