Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HR174 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	IV
2	2	119THCONGRESS
3	3	1
4	4	STSESSION H. RES. 174
5	5	Impeaching Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, a judge of the United States District
6	6	Court for the District of Columbia, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
7	7	IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
8	8	FEBRUARY27, 2025
9	9	Mr. O
10	10	GLES(for himself and Mr. GILLof Texas) submitted the following
11	11	resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
12	12	RESOLUTION
13	13	Impeaching Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, a judge of the United
14	14	States District Court for the District of Columbia, for
15	15	high crimes and misdemeanors.
16	16	Resolved, That Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, a judge of 1
17	17	the United States District Court for the District of Colum-2
18	18	bia, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and 3
19	19	that the following article of impeachment be exhibited to 4
20	20	the Senate: 5
21	21	Article of impeachment exhibited by the House of 6
22	22	Representatives of the United States of America in the 7
23	23	name of itself and of the people of the United States of 8
24	24	America, against Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, a judge of the 9
25	25	United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 10
26	26	VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:12 Feb 27, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR174.IH HR174
27	27	ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS 2
28	28	•HRES 174 IH
29	29	in maintenance and support of its impeachment against 1
30	30	him for high crimes and misdemeanors. 2
31	31	ARTICLE I 3
32	32	4
33	33	Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, a judge of the United States 5
34	34	District Court for the District of Columbia, engaged in 6
35	35	a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust 7
36	36	and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge, as fol-8
37	37	lows: 9
38	38	Judge Ali, in a 2024 written statement to the Senate 10
39	39	Judiciary Committee, asserted that a ‘‘judge must decide 11
40	40	issues based on an impartial and objective application of 12
41	41	the law to the record before the court’’. In issuing a tem-13
42	42	porary restraining order against the ‘‘pausing’’ of funds 14
43	43	promulgated in Executive Order 14169, Judge Ali has 15
44	44	without merit marginalized the President’s Article II au-16
45	45	thority, which vests the power to conduct foreign policy 17
46	46	in the President of the United States, and has further 18
47	47	compromised the President’s fiduciary obligation to review 19
48	48	federal agencies and programs. This patent violation of 20
49	49	Constitutional precedent—which necessarily precludes an 21
50	50	explanation based on ignorance of the supreme law of the 22
51	51	land—is entirely inconsistent with serving the United 23
52	52	States as a district court judge. 24
53	53	Judge Ali, in mandating the immediate outlay of 25
54	54	funds in contradiction of subsection (a) of Section 3 of 26
55	55	VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:12 Feb 27, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR174.IH HR174
56	56	ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS 3
57	57	•HRES 174 IH
58	58	Executive Order 14169, has done so in a manner that is 1
59	59	arbitrary and capricious. The understood purpose of the 2
60	60	President’s Executive order was to review such funds for 3
61	61	consistency with United States foreign policy. By man-4
62	62	dating immediate funding disbursement of funds paused 5
63	63	by the President’s Executive order, Judge Ali did so with 6
64	64	no consideration for the troubled history of foreign assist-7
65	65	ance through the United States Agency for International 8
66	66	Development (USAID). A March 2021 GAO report indi-9
67	67	cates that from FY2015 until FY2019, USAID did not 10
68	68	consistently ensure that subawards provided for projects 11
69	69	in the Gaza Strip and Judea and Samaria complied with 12
70	70	regulations aimed at preventing financial support for ter-13
71	71	rorism. More recently, in November 2024, USAID was 14
72	72	found to have financed hundreds of thousands of meals 15
73	73	for al-Qaida affiliated fighters in Syria. While arguing 16
74	74	that the Trump administration funding pause caused ‘‘ir-17
75	75	reparable harm’’, Judge Ali failed to consider that his de-18
76	76	cision could easily inflict ‘‘irreparable harm’’ on Americans 19
77	77	and American interests. 20
78	78	Accordingly, Judge Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali has en-21
79	79	gaged in conduct so utterly lacking in intellectual honesty 22
80	80	and basic integrity that he is guilty of high crimes and 23
81	81	VerDate Sep 11 2014 00:44 Feb 28, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR174.IH HR174
82	82	ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS 4
83	83	•HRES 174 IH
84	84	misdemeanors, is unfit to hold the office of Federal judge, 1
85	85	and should be removed from office. 2
86	86	Æ
87	87	VerDate Sep 11 2014 23:12 Feb 27, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\HR174.IH HR174
88	88	ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS