Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

Us Congress House Bill HR199 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.

Old	New	Differences
1	1	IV
2	2	119THCONGRESS
3	3	1
4	4	STSESSION H. RES. 199
5	5	Condemning woke foreign aid programs.
6	6	IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
7	7	MARCH6, 2025
8	8	Mr. B
9	9	URCHETTsubmitted the following resolution; which was referred to the
10	10	Committee on Foreign Affairs
11	11	RESOLUTION
12	12	Condemning woke foreign aid programs.
13	13	Whereas the United States spent $2,000,000 on a
14	14	transgender health grant in Guatemala, awarded in 2024
15	15	to Asociacio´n Lambda for ‘‘gender-affirming health
16	16	care’’, plus economic empowerment and advocacy for
17	17	trans-led groups, with $350,000 disbursed so far;
18	18	Whereas the United States spent $20,000,000 on Iraqi Ses-
19	19	ame Street, entitled ‘‘Ahlan Simsim’’, funded to support
20	20	educational programming for children in Iraq, with dis-
21	21	bursements ongoing;
22	22	Whereas the United States spent $1,500,000 on diversity, eq-
23	23	uity, and inclusion workplace programs in Serbia, a
24	24	United States Agency for International Development
25	25	(USAID) grant from 2023 to 2024 to Grupa Izadji to
26	26	push diversity, equity, and inclusion in workplaces, aim-
27	27	VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:50 Mar 07, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR199.IH HR199
28	28	kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB 2
29	29	•HRES 199 IH
30	30	ing to boost LGBTQI+ economic engagement, with
31	31	about $1,140,000 paid out so far;
32	32	Whereas the United States spent $45,000,000 on diversity,
33	33	equity, and inclusion scholarships in Burma, funded to
34	34	provide diversity, equity, and inclusion-focused edu-
35	35	cational opportunities, with details on disbursements un-
36	36	available at this time;
37	37	Whereas the United States spent $10,000,000 on male cir-
38	38	cumcision in Mozambique;
39	39	Whereas the United States spent $250,000 on gender equal-
40	40	ity workshops in Morocco, through a 2023 Department of
41	41	State grant to Association Marocaine pour les Droits des
42	42	Femmes for workshops promoting gender equality and
43	43	women’s entrepreneurship;
44	44	Whereas the United States spent $100,000 on a drag HIV
45	45	awareness campaign in South Africa;
46	46	Whereas the United States spent $85,000 on a bee conserva-
47	47	tion musical in Brazil, funded in 2023 to raise awareness
48	48	about bee conservation through a musical performance in
49	49	Sa˜o Paulo;
50	50	Whereas the United States spent $70,000 on an Irish diver-
51	51	sity, equity, and inclusion musical, funded a ‘‘live musical
52	52	event’’ in Ireland in 2022 to promote United States-Ire-
53	53	land shared values of diversity, equity, inclusion, and ac-
54	54	cessibility, not a full musical, but a concert-style gig at
55	55	the United States Embassy;
56	56	Whereas the United States spent $60,000 on indigenous di-
57	57	versity, equity, and inclusion training in Bolivia, through
58	58	a 2023 USAID grant for diversity and inclusion work-
59	59	shops for indigenous leaders in La Paz;
60	60	VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:50 Mar 07, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR199.IH HR199
61	61	kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB 3
62	62	•HRES 199 IH
63	63	Whereas the United States spent $50,000 on vegan cooking
64	64	classes in Kenya, and USAID funded this 2023 program
65	65	to teach plant-based cooking in Nairobi to promote sus-
66	66	tainability;
67	67	Whereas the United States spent $40,000 on a feminist
68	68	podcast series in Chile, funded in 2022 by the Depart-
69	69	ment of State for a podcast on feminist issues in
70	70	Santiago;
71	71	Whereas the United States spent $32,000 on a transgender
72	72	comic book in Peru, through Department of State fund-
73	73	ing in 2021 to Peru’s Education Department via Ful-
74	74	bright for ‘‘The Power of Education’’, a comic featuring
75	75	an LGBTQ+ hero tackling social and mental health
76	76	issues;
77	77	Whereas the United States spent $30,000 on a trans youth
78	78	art exhibit in Vietnam, through a 2022 Department of
79	79	State grant for an art exhibit by transgender youth in
80	80	Ho Chi Minh City;
81	81	Whereas the United States spent $25,000 on a transgender
82	82	opera in Colombia, through a Department of State grant
83	83	in 2022 to Universidad de los Andes in Bogota´for ‘‘As
84	84	One’’, an opera about a transgender woman’s coming-of-
85	85	age story, framed as public diplomacy (total project
86	86	$47,020 with non-Federal funds);
87	87	Whereas the United States spent $25,000 on a transgender
88	88	fashion show in Thailand, through a 2024 grant for a
89	89	fashion show featuring transgender designers in Bang-
90	90	kok;
91	91	Whereas the United States spent $20,000 on drag queen
92	92	training in Pakistan, funded in 2022 by the Department
93	93	VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:50 Mar 07, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR199.IH HR199
94	94	kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB 4
95	95	•HRES 199 IH
96	96	of State to train drag performers in Pakistan as part of
97	97	a cultural exchange program;
98	98	Whereas the United States spent $15,000 on a queer film
99	99	festival in Ecuador, through a 2024 grant to fund an
100	100	LGBTQ+ film festival in Quito, Ecuador, for ‘‘public di-
101	101	plomacy’’; and
102	102	Whereas the United States spent $10,000 on a queer poetry
103	103	slam in India, through a 2024 grant for a poetry event
104	104	in New Delhi celebrating queer voices: Now, therefore, be
105	105	it
106	106	Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 1
107	107	(1) is firmly opposed to funding these programs 2
108	108	and programs like these, viewing them as wasteful 3
109	109	expenditures of taxpayer dollars on frivolous or ideo-4
110	110	logically driven initiatives; 5
111	111	(2) requests more oversight of Federal aid pro-6
112	112	grams, including a comprehensive audit by the Gov-7
113	113	ernment Accountability Office of all grants awarded 8
114	114	by the Department of State and United States 9
115	115	Agency for International Development since 2021; 10
116	116	(3) urges the immediate suspension of similar 11
117	117	discretionary grants pending a review of their align-12
118	118	ment with core national interests and fiscal responsi-13
119	119	bility; 14
120	120	(4) demands transparency by mandating public 15
121	121	disclosure of all grant applications, justifications, 16
122	122	and outcomes on a searchable online database not 17
123	123	VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:50 Mar 07, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR199.IH HR199
124	124	kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB 5
125	125	•HRES 199 IH
126	126	later than 90 days after the date on which such a 1
127	127	grant is awarded; 2
128	128	(5) recommends redirecting funds from such 3
129	129	programs to domestic priorities, including infrastruc-4
130	130	ture repair, veteran health care, or disaster relief ef-5
131	131	forts; 6
132	132	(6) encourages the inspector general of each 7
133	133	relevant agency to conduct annual reviews of grant 8
134	134	efficacy, with findings reported to Congress and 9
135	135	made available to the public; 10
136	136	(7) proposes a cap on annual spending for cul-11
137	137	tural exchange and advocacy grants abroad, limiting 12
138	138	such expenditures to no more than 0.1 percent of 13
139	139	the Federal discretionary budget; 14
140	140	(8) insists on a requirement that all future 15
141	141	grants over $10,000 receive explicit congressional 16
142	142	approval via a streamlined review process; and 17
143	143	(9) expresses its intent to draft legislation pro-18
144	144	hibiting the use of Federal funds for overseas pro-19
145	145	grams promoting niche social agendas absent a clear 20
146	146	and direct benefit to United States national security 21
147	147	or economic interests. 22
148	148	Æ
149	149	VerDate Sep 11 2014 01:50 Mar 07, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6301 E:\BILLS\HR199.IH HR199
150	150	kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB